Flores et al v. Velocity Express, Inc.
Filing
167
STIPULATION AND ORDER re (166 in 3:12-cv-05790-JST) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Combine CMC and Motion Hearing Dates filed by Darah Doung, Phillip Flores. Case Management Statement due by 6/11/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/25/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 19, 2015. This change in dates applies to all related cases.(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Timothy J. Becker (MN Bar No. 256663)
tbecker@johnsonbecker.com
Jacob R. Rusch (MN Bar No. 391892)
jrusch@johnsonbecker.com
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: (612) 436-1800
Fax: (612) 436-1801
7
Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs
8
Robert G. Hulteng, Bar No. 071293
rhulteng@littler.com
Andrew M. Spurchise, Bar No. 245998
aspurchise@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108.2693
Telephone: (415) 433-1940
Fax: (415) 399-8490
9
10
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for Defendants
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
PHILLIP FLORES and DARAH DOUNG,
individually and on behalf of all similarly
situated individuals,
Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST
Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Jon
S. Tigar
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
JOINT STIPULATION TO COMBINE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND MOTION HEARING DATES
20
21
22
VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC, a whollyowned subsidiary of Dynamex Operations
East, LLC1, TRANSFORCE, INC., and
DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC,
Complaint Filed:
FAC Filed:
SAC Filed:
TAC Filed:
4th AC Filed:
23
Defendants,
24
November 9, 2012
January 8, 2013
July 17, 2013
March 28, 2013
June 26, 2014
25
26
27
28
1
Formerly Dynamex Operations East, Inc.
JOINT STIPULATION TO
COMBINE CMC AND MOTION
HEARING DATES
1
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST
1
2
3
The Parties through their respective attorneys of record respectfully request that the Court
combine the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for June 10, 2015, and the hearing on
Defendants’ Motion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), currently scheduled for June 25, 2015. Given
4
5
the close proximity of the two hearing dates, and the expense of travel to the San Francisco Bay Area,
6
the Parties propose the Court conduct both the CMC and the Motion hearing on Thursday, June 25,
7
2015.
8
9
10
Subject to the Court’s approval, the Parties further stipulate to provide a Joint Case
Management Statement to the Court no later than June 11, 2015.
SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: May 18, 2015
/s/ Timothy J. Becker
Timothy J. Becker
Jacob R. Rusch
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs
Dated: May 18, 2015
/s/ Andrew M. Spurchise
ROBERT G. HULTENG
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE
Littler Mendelson, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO
COMBINE CMC AND MOTION
HEARING DATES
2
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST
1
2
ATTESTATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
I, Jacob Rusch, declare under penalty of perjury and pursuant to the laws of California and
3
4
5
6
the United States that I have in my possession e-mail correspondence from Alexander H.
Scherbatskoy that the content of this Joint Stipulation is acceptable to all persons required to sign it.
I declare that this Stipulation was signed in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on May 18, 2015.
7
/s/ Jacob R. Rusch
Jacob R. Rusch
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO
COMBINE CMC AND MOTION
HEARING DATES
3
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST
RT
6
n
J u d ge J o
ER
H
7
8
S . Ti ga r
FO
NO
5
LI
4
R NIA
D
DERE
___________________________
SO OR
IT IS
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United State District Court Judge
May 19
Dated: _______________, 2015
A
3
UNIT
ED
2
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO
COMBINE CMC AND MOTION
HEARING DATES
4
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?