Flores et al v. Velocity Express, Inc.

Filing 203

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 202 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AN UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by TransForce, Inc., Dynamex Operations East, LLC, Velocity Express, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 12, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ROBERT G. HULTENG, Bar No. 071293 rhulteng@littler.com AURELIO J. PEREZ, Bar No. 282135 aperez@littler.com JESSICA X. ROTHENBERG, Bar No. 284823 jrothenberg@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 Attorneys for Defendants VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC and TRANSFORCE, INC. and DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC 13 Timothy J. Becker (MN Bar No. 256663) tbecker@johnsonbecker.com Jacob R. Rusch (MN Bar No. 391892) jrusch@johnsonbecker.com JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC 33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: 612.436.1800 Facsimile: 612.436.1801 14 Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs 10 11 12 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 PHILLIP FLORES and DARAH DOUNG, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiffs, v. VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC a whollyowned subsidiary of Dynamex Operations East, LLC, TRANSFORCE, INC., and DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC, Defendants. 25 Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Jon S. Tigar JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AN UPDATED JOINT CASE MANGEMENT STATEMENT Date: July 20, 2016 Time: 2 p.m. Courtroom: 9 This document relates to all cases. Complaint Filed: 1st Amended Complaint Filed: 2nd Amended Complaint Filed: 3rd Amended Complaint Filed: 4th Amended Complaint Filed: 26 27 Nov. 9, 2012 Jan. 8, 2013 July 18, 2013 Mar. 28, 2014 June 26, 2014 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE JT CMC STMT Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST 1 The Parties through their respective attorneys of record respectfully request that the 2 deadline to file an Updated Joint Case Management Statement, currently due July 13, 2016, be 3 continued until July 15, 2016. 4 Counsel for Plaintiffs will be in deposition on July 11 through July 13 and are 5 unavailable to finalize the Updated Joint Case Management Statement. Accordingly, the Parties 6 conducted a short meet-and-confer regarding the proposed change in schedule and have agreed to 7 continue the deadline to file an Updated Joint Case Management Statement to Friday, July 15, 2016 8 in advance of the July 20, 2016 Case Management Conference. 9 10 Dated: July 11, 2016 /s/ Aurelio J. Perez_____________ AURELIO J. PEREZ LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC and TRANSFORCE, INC. and DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC Dated: July 11, 2016 /s/ Jacob R. Rusch TIMOTHY J. BECKER JACOB R. RUSCH JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE JT CMC STMT 2. Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline to file an Updated Joint Case Management Statement, currently due July 13, 2016, be continued until July 15, 2016. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 12 Dated: July_____, 2016 8 9 HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 10 11 Firmwide:141418840.1 064752.1003 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE JT CMC STMT 3. Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?