Flores et al v. Velocity Express, Inc.
Filing
203
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 202 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE AN UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by TransForce, Inc., Dynamex Operations East, LLC, Velocity Express, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 12, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ROBERT G. HULTENG, Bar No. 071293
rhulteng@littler.com
AURELIO J. PEREZ, Bar No. 282135
aperez@littler.com
JESSICA X. ROTHENBERG, Bar No. 284823
jrothenberg@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendants
VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC and TRANSFORCE,
INC. and DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC
13
Timothy J. Becker (MN Bar No. 256663)
tbecker@johnsonbecker.com
Jacob R. Rusch (MN Bar No. 391892)
jrusch@johnsonbecker.com
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: 612.436.1800
Facsimile:
612.436.1801
14
Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs
10
11
12
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
PHILLIP FLORES and DARAH DOUNG,
individually and on behalf of all similarly
situated individuals,
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiffs,
v.
VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC a whollyowned subsidiary of Dynamex Operations
East, LLC, TRANSFORCE, INC., and
DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC,
Defendants.
25
Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST
Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Jon S.
Tigar
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE
AN UPDATED JOINT CASE MANGEMENT
STATEMENT
Date:
July 20, 2016
Time:
2 p.m.
Courtroom: 9
This document relates to all cases.
Complaint Filed:
1st Amended Complaint Filed:
2nd Amended Complaint Filed:
3rd Amended Complaint Filed:
4th Amended Complaint Filed:
26
27
Nov. 9, 2012
Jan. 8, 2013
July 18, 2013
Mar. 28, 2014
June 26, 2014
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street
34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.433.1940
JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE JT CMC STMT
Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST
1
The Parties through their respective attorneys of record respectfully request that the
2
deadline to file an Updated Joint Case Management Statement, currently due July 13, 2016, be
3
continued until July 15, 2016.
4
Counsel for Plaintiffs will be in deposition on July 11 through July 13 and are
5
unavailable to finalize the Updated Joint Case Management Statement. Accordingly, the Parties
6
conducted a short meet-and-confer regarding the proposed change in schedule and have agreed to
7
continue the deadline to file an Updated Joint Case Management Statement to Friday, July 15, 2016
8
in advance of the July 20, 2016 Case Management Conference.
9
10
Dated: July 11, 2016
/s/ Aurelio J. Perez_____________
AURELIO J. PEREZ
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC and
TRANSFORCE, INC. and DYNAMEX
OPERATIONS EAST, LLC
Dated: July 11, 2016
/s/ Jacob R. Rusch
TIMOTHY J. BECKER
JACOB R. RUSCH
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street
34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.433.1940
JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE JT CMC STMT
2.
Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST
1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline to file an Updated Joint Case
Management Statement, currently due July 13, 2016, be continued until July 15, 2016.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
12
Dated: July_____, 2016
8
9
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
10
11
Firmwide:141418840.1 064752.1003
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street
34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.433.1940
JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE JT CMC STMT
3.
Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?