Flores et al v. Velocity Express, Inc.

Filing 252

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 251 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 247 Emergency Ex Parte Application to Supplement the Declaration of Timothy J. Becker Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(1) filed by Dynamex Operations East, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 9, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

Timothy J. Becker (MN Bar No. 256663)
[e-mail]
Jacob R. Rusch (MN Bar No. 391892)
[e-mail]
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs

6
7
8
9
10
11

Robert G. Hulteng, Bar No. 071293
[e-mail]
Aurelio J. Pérez, Bar No. 282135
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

PHILLIP FLORES and DARAH DOUNG,
individually and on behalf of all similarly
situated individuals,

16

Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST
Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Jon
S. Tigar

Plaintiffs,
v.

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MOTION
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P 56(E)
[DKT 247]

17
18
19

VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Dynamex
Operations East, LLC1, TRANSFORCE, INC.,
and DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC,

20

Complaint Filed:
FAC Filed:
SAC Filed:
TAC Filed:
4th AC Filed:

Defendants,

21

November 9, 2012
January 8, 2013
July 17, 2013
March 28, 2013
June 26, 2014

22
1

Formerly Dynamex Operations East, Inc.

23
JT. STIP RE PLTFS’ EMERGENCY RULE
56(E) MTN
FIRMWIDE:146262793.2 064752.1003

1

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST

1

Following the telephonic Case Management Conference held on March 8, 2017, the Parties

2

further discussed the evidentiary issues raised in Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for

3

Partial Summary Judgment as to Misclassification and Willfulness that were raised during the case

4

management conference. See generally Dkt. Nos. 241-250. In order to streamline the remaining

5

evidentiary disputes, the Parties stipulate as follows:

6

1.

Exhibits 1 and 4 (the archived websites) to the Declaration of Timothy J. Becker
(“Becker Dec.”) are not properly authenticated;

2.

The deposition excerpts attached to the Becker Dec. are authentic copies of the
transcripts created and produced in this case;

3.

The deposition exhibits attached to the Becker Dec. are true and correct copies of
the documents submitted during the depositions cited in the Becker Dec.; and

4.

Defendants retain all other evidentiary objections raised in its opposition to the
deposition transcripts and deposition exhibits including remaining disputes regarding
foundation.

5.

The parties further agree that, upon entry of order, no further action—including any
further briefing by either party or hearing—is needed with regard to Plaintiffs’
emergency motion [Dkt No. 248].

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

SO STIPULATED.

16

///

17

///

18

///
///

19
///
20

///

21

///

22

///

23
JT. STIP RE PLTFS’ EMERGENCY RULE
56(E) MTN
FIRMWIDE:146262793.2 064752.1003

2

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST

1

Dated: March 8, 2017

/s/ Jacob R. Rusch
Timothy J. Becker
Jacob R. Rusch
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs

Dated: March 8, 2017

/s/ Aurelio J. Perez
Robert G. Hulteng
Aurelio J. Perez
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, this ___ of March 2017.

10
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
JT. STIP RE PLTFS’ EMERGENCY RULE
56(E) MTN
FIRMWIDE:146262793.2 064752.1003

3

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST