Maclellan v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 112

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Thomas M. McInerney is appointed counsel for Doreen MacLellan. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 21, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/21/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DOREEN MACLELLAN Plaintiff(s), vs. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ET AL. Defendant(s). ) ) ) Case Number: 12-5795 ) ) ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL ) ) ) ) plaintiff Because the ___________________ has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him/her in this matter and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of the Federal Pro Bono Project, ___________________________ Deakins, Nash, Thomas M. McInerney of Ogletree, _____________________ is hereby appointed as counsel for ____________________ in this matter. Smoak & Stewart, P.C. Doreen MacLellan The scope of this referral shall be for: X all purposes for the duration of the case the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of mediation early neutral evaluation settlement conference briefing and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss): __________________________________________________________ discovery as follows: __________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ other: __________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project Guidelines posted on the Court’s website. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 21, 2014 United States District/Magistrate Judge EXHIBIT D TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT GUIDELINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?