Braun v. Primary Distributor Doe Number One et al
Filing
14
ORDER re motion for reconsideration. Given Plaintiffs reliance on the Courts previous orders in this case, Plaintiff may use the previously subpoenaed information in order to attempt resolution through investigation and possible settlement prior to re-filing complaints against the severed Doe Defendants.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/16/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
Northern District of California
6
7
AXEL BRAUN,
8
Plaintiff,
9
No. C 12-5786 MEJ
and previously related cases: 12-5812 MEJ
12-5813 MEJ
12-5814 MEJ
v.
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
PRIMARY DISTRIBUTOR DOE NUMBER
1 and DEFENDANT DOES 2 through 38,
ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
13
14
On March 11, 2013, the Court severed all Does except Doe 1 from these four cases and
15
removed the related case designation for them. Dkt. No. 14. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s
16
Application for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration or in the Alternative Request for Further
17
Clarification. Dkt. No. 15. Upon review of Plaintiff’s Application, the Court DENIES his request to
18
file a motion for reconsideration. However, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for clarification
19
as follows: Given Plaintiff’s reliance on the Court’s previous orders in this case, Plaintiff may use
20
the previously subpoenaed information in order to attempt resolution through investigation and
21
possible settlement prior to re-filing complaints against the severed Doe Defendants.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 16, 2013
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?