Hassan v. Astrue

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION AND BRIEF FILED IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR REMAND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/5/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-05821-RS Document16 Filed06/05/13 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 RICHARD ZIEMAN (CSB 230832) 254 MILLER AVE., SUITE A MILL VALLEY, CA 94942-1739 Telephone: (415) 388-3800 Facsimile: (415) 388-1060 Email: Zieman@ssalawca.com Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 NAHEEMAH L. HASSAN Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 14 Commissioner of Social Security 15 Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 5821 Case No.: 12-CV-5281 RS STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION AND BRIEF FILED IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR REMAND. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the 18 approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of 10 days in which to file Plaintiff’s 19 response to Defendant’s cross motion and brief filed in response to Plaintiff’s Motion for 20 Summary Judgment. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-1(e). Plaintiff’s response is now due on Monday, 21 June 17, 2013. 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 Case3:12-cv-05821-RS Document16 Filed06/05/13 Page2 of 2 1 2 DATED: 6/5/2013 3 _Richard Zieman /s/ RICHARD ZIEMAN Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 7 DATED: 6/5/2013 8 Daniel P. Talbert /s/ DANIEL P. TALBERT, Specialist Assistant U.S. Attorney 9 10 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 16 17 18 6/5/13 DATED: __________ ___________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P’s Stip/Order of ext to submit SJM, 12-CV-5513 JST Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?