Lincoln General Insurance Company v. Schoepp Construction Inc et al

Filing 50

ORDER TO SUBMIT PROOF OF ELIGIBILITY TO PRACTICE LAW. Mark Hooper shall submit his proof to the Court no later than 9/24/2013. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 9/10/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2013).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE 13 COMPANY, 14 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:12-cv-05835 NC ORDER TO SUBMIT PROOF OF ELIGIBILITY TO PRACTICE LAW 15 v. 16 SCHOEPP CONSTRUCTION INC., GREGORY SCHOEPP, MICHAEL 17 DAYAN, CIVITELLO-JOY REMODELING, JEAN JACQUES 18 BIENAIME, JENNIFER BIENAIME, DOES 19 20 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants. 21 22 Counsel for Plaintiff, Mark A. Hooper, is ORDERED to submit proof to the Court of 23 his current eligibility to practice law in California, no later than September 24, 2013. The 24 Court notes that the State Bar website lists Mr. Hooper as suspended and not eligible to 25 practice law as of July 2, 2013, for failure to pay Bar membership fees. To practice before 26 this Court, “an attorney must be an active member in good standing of the State Bar of 27 California.” Civ. L.R. 11-1(b). The Court draws Mr. Hooper’s attention to Civil Local 28 Rule 11-1(g)(1), which states that the Clerk of this Court may note Mr. Hooper’s Case No. 3:12-cv-05835 NC ORDER TO SUBMIT PROOF OF ELIGIBILITY TO PRACTICE LAW 1 suspension on his admission record, and that an attorney who files papers or otherwise 2 practices before the Court while ineligible may be subject to an order of the Chief District 3 Judge to show cause why a suspension or disbarment order should not be entered. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Date: September 10, 2013 _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:12-cv-05835 NC ORDER TO SUBMIT PROOF OF ELIGIBILITY TO PRACTICE LAW 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?