Hightower et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 108

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 106 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE filed by City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department Status Report due by 2/5/2015. Status Conference set for 2/12/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/9/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137 Deputy City Attorney TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775 Deputy City Attorney City Hall, Room 234 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, California 94102-4602 Telephone: (415) 554-4655 Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 E-Mail: tara.steeley@sfgov.org 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB, GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL MILLS, RUSSELL “TREY” ALLEN and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Case No. C 12-5841-EMC (NJV) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE Plaintiffs, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC n:\govern\li2012\130496\00809456.doc 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE STATUS CONFERENCE 2 3 Plaintiffs Oxane “Gypsy” Taub and George Davis, and Defendants the City and County of San 4 Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department, through their respective counsel of record, hereby 5 stipulate as follows: 6 7 8 9 10 1. Pursuant to the Clerk’s Notice dated December 16, 2014, a Status Conference is currently set for January 22, 2015 [Dkt No. 103]. 2. Pursuant to the same Clerk’s Notice, the parties are required to file a Status Report for that January 22, 2015 Status Conference on or before January 15, 2015. 3. On or about January 6, 2015, Defendants’ lead counsel, Tara Steeley, suffered an 11 unexpected death in her family, requiring her to be out of the office and out of state to attend to family. 12 Ms. Steeley will not return to the state and to work until after January 15, 2015. 13 4. In light of the foregoing, Defendants have requested, and Plaintiffs have agreed, subject 14 to the agreement of the Court, to continue the Status Conference to February 12, 2015, with the Status 15 Report due on February 5, 2015. 16 17 18 SO STIPULATED: Dated: January 9, 2015 19 20 21 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS TARA M. STEELEY Deputy City Attorneys By: /s/Wayne Snodgrass WAYNE SNODGRASS 22 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC 1 n:\govern\li2012\130496\00809456.doc 1 Dated: January 9, 2015 D. GILL SPERLEIN, ESQ. The Law Office Of D. Gill Sperlein 2 By: /s/** D. Gill Sperlein, Esq. D. GILL SPERLEIN, ESQ. 3 4 Attorney for Plaintiffs OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB and GEORGE DAVIS 5 6 **pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has obtained approval from this signatory. 7 8 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, the Status Conference is continued as follows: 11 1. The Status Conference currently set for January 22, 2015 is continued to February 12, 2. The Status Report shall be filed on or before February 5, 2015. 2015. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 1/9/15 S Dated: RT U O ard M. NO 19 RT 20 ER H 21 dw Judge E 22 Chen FO 18 RDER OO IT IS S LI 17 R NIA The Honorable Edward M. Chen UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ED UNIT ED 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 12 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION/PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC 2 n:\govern\li2012\130496\00809456.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?