Hightower et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
135
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 133 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CORRECTION OF DOCKET # 131 STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENTER FINAL ORDER filed by George Davis, Oxane "Gypsy" Taub. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/223/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015)
Case3:12-cv-05841-EMC Document133 Filed06/16/15 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
WALTERS LAW GROUP
195 WEST PINE AVENUE, LONGWOOD, FL 32750
407-975-9150
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAWRENCE G. WALTERS, FL SBN 776599 (pro hac vice)
WALTERS LAW GROUP
195 West Pine Ave.
Longwood, FL 32750
Telephone: (407) 975-9105
larry@firstamendment.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB and GEORGE DAVIS
11
12
13
14
THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN
345GROVE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
415-404-6615
D. GILL SPERLEIN, SBN 172887
THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN
345 Grove Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (415) 404-6615
Facsimile: (415) 404-6616
gill@sperleinlaw.com
15
16
17
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
)
OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB and GEORGE ) Case № 3:12-cv-05841-EMC (NJV)
)
DAVIS,
) STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENTER
Plaintiffs,
) FINAL ORDER
v.
)
)
CITY and COUNTY of SAN
)
FRANCISCO and the SAN
FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT )
)
Defendants
)
20
21
WHEREAS, the Court previously Granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ original
22
Complaint and denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction based on that Complaint,
23
[January 29, 2013, Dkt. No. 26], and Granted Defendants’ Motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims
24
25
26
against the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department for
Restriction of Core Political Speech, Prior Restraint, Compelled Speech, Vagueness, and Claim for
27
28
-1STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENTER FINAL ORDER
3:12-cv-05841-EMC (NJV)
Case3:12-cv-05841-EMC Document133 Filed06/16/15 Page2 of 3
1
2
Injunctive Relief/Declaratory Judgment pled in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint on December
24, 2014. (Dkt. No. 104);
WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs previously withdrew their claim against the City and County of
3
4
San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department based on the right to petition;
WALTERS LAW GROUP
195 WEST PINE AVENUE, LONGWOOD, FL 32750
407-975-9150
5
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs only remaining claim against the City and County of San Francisco
and the San Francisco Police Department is a claim for unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination;
7
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a Settlement Agreement settling Plaintiffs’ claim
8
9
10
against the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department for
unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination;
11
WHEREAS, under the Settlement Agreement, the Parties stipulated to the entry of a Final
12
Order disposing of this case, and reserving the rights of Plaintiffs to appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court
13
of Appeals the causes of action the Court dismissed on December 24, 2014, including the Court’s
14
THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN
345GROVE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
415-404-6615
conclusion that Plaintiffs cannot obtain injunctive relief;
15
THEREFORE, the Parties do thereby STIPULATE and AGREE that the Court enter a
16
17
final, appealable order in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
18
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
20
21
Dated:
22
23
24
6/15/2015
By: /s/ D. Gill Sperlein
D. GILL SPERLEIN
THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN
LAWRENCE G. WALTERS, pro hac vice
WALTERS LAW GROUP
25
26
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Oxane “Gypsy” Taub and George Davis
27
28
-2STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENTER FINAL ORDER
3:12-cv-05841-EMC (NJV)
Case3:12-cv-05841-EMC Document133 Filed06/16/15 Page3 of 3
1
2
3
4
WALTERS LAW GROUP
195 WEST PINE AVENUE, LONGWOOD, FL 32750
407-975-9150
5
6
7
8
Dated: 6/15/2015
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
By: /s/ Tara M. Steeley
TARA M. STEELEY
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
9
10
11
12
13
THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN
345GROVE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
415-404-6615
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENTER FINAL ORDER
3:12-cv-05841-EMC (NJV)
Case3:12-cv-05841-EMC Document133-1 Filed06/16/15 Page1 of 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
2
3
4
5
6
OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB and GEORGE
DAVIS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
7
8
9
CITY and COUNTY of SAN
FRANCISCO and the SAN
FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendants
10
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case № 3:12-cv-05841-EMC (NJV)
STIPULATED [PROPOSED] FINAL
ORDER
)
11
12
The Court has reviewed the Stipulated Request to Enter Final Order disposing of this case. It
13
appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the Parties have settled and dismissed the sole
14
remaining claim for unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, and have further stipulated that
15
Plaintiffs be permitted to appeal the prior adverse rulings by this Court, it is hereby
16
17
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that final judgment be rendered in favor of Defendants and
against Plaintiffs. The clerk is directed to close the case file.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED
20
S
23
_________________________________
ED
ORDER
SODWARD M. CHEN
U.S. DISTRICTIJUDGE E
T IS
24
RT
28
ER
Copies to: Counsel of Record
A
H
26
n
M. Che
LI
NO
25
27
dward
Judge E
R NIA
6/22/15
Dated: ________________
UNIT
ED
22
RT
U
O
21
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
19
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
-1STIPULATED [PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER
3:12-cv-05841-EMC (NJV)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?