Hightower et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 To Continue Initial Case Management Conference filed by Scott Weiner, City and County of San Francisco, Angela Calvillo, David Chiu Case Management Statement due by 5/30/2013. Case Management Conference set for 6/6/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/12/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137
Deputy City Attorney
TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775
Deputy City Attorney
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone:
(415) 554-4655
Facsimile:
(415) 554-4699
E-Mail:
tara.steeley@sfgov.org
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
DAVID CHIU, SCOTT WIENER and ANGELA CALVILLO
[in their official capacities]
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE “GYPSY”
TAUB, GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL MILLS,
and on behalf of all persons similarly situated,
16
Plaintiffs,
17
vs.
18
19
20
21
22
23
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, DAVID CHIU in his official
capacity only as President of the Board of
Supervisors of the City and County of San
Francisco, SCOTT WIENER in his official
capacity only as a member of the Board of
Supervisors of the City and County of San
Francisco, and ANGELA CALVILLO, in her
official capacity only as Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC
CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC
Case No. C 12-5841-EMC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
STIPULATION
1
Whereas the Court’s Order dated January 24, 2013 set the initial Case Management
2
3
Conference (“CMC”) in this action for March 28, 2013;
4
Whereas the Court’s Order dated January 29, 2013 granted the City and County of San
5
Francisco’s Motion to Dismiss and gave Plaintiffs forty-five (45) days to file an amended complaint;
6
Whereas Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is due on March 15, 2013;
7
Whereas the setting of the initial CMC for March 28, 2013 requires the parties to file ADR
8
forms and satisfy the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by March 7,
9
2013;
10
11
12
13
Whereas the parties are having difficulty satisfying the ADR and Rule 26(f) requirements in
good faith because no complaint is currently on file in this action;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Plaintiffs and Defendants,
subject to approval of the Court, that:
14
The Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued until June 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
15
SO STIPULATED:
16
Dated: March 7, 2013
17
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS
TARA M. STEELEY
Deputy City Attorneys
18
19
20
21
By: s/Tara M. Steeley
TARA M. STEELEY
22
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID
CHIU, SCOTT WIENER and ANGELA CALVILLO
[in their official capacities]
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC
CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC
1
n:\govlit\li2013\130496\00832623.doc
1
Dated: March 7, 2013
2
CHRISTINA A. DIEDOARDO
Law Offices of Christina DiEdoardo
3
4
5
By:Christina A. DiEdoardo
CHRISTINA A. DIEDOARDO
Attorney for Plaintiffs
MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB,
GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL MILLS, ET AL.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC
CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC
2
n:\govlit\li2013\130496\00832623.doc
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued until
2
June 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
4
7
RT
H
ER
LI
dwar
Judge E
Hon. Edward M. Chen
9
10
11
en
d M. Ch
NO
8
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FO
6
S
3/12/13
UNIT
ED
Date:
RT
U
O
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC
CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC
3
n:\govlit\li2013\130496\00832623.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?