Hightower et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 To Continue Initial Case Management Conference filed by Scott Weiner, City and County of San Francisco, Angela Calvillo, David Chiu Case Management Statement due by 5/30/2013. Case Management Conference set for 6/6/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/12/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137 Deputy City Attorney TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775 Deputy City Attorney City Hall, Room 234 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, California 94102-4682 Telephone: (415) 554-4655 Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 E-Mail: tara.steeley@sfgov.org 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID CHIU, SCOTT WIENER and ANGELA CALVILLO [in their official capacities] 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB, GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL MILLS, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 22 23 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID CHIU in his official capacity only as President of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, SCOTT WIENER in his official capacity only as a member of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, and ANGELA CALVILLO, in her official capacity only as Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC Case No. C 12-5841-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STIPULATION 1 Whereas the Court’s Order dated January 24, 2013 set the initial Case Management 2 3 Conference (“CMC”) in this action for March 28, 2013; 4 Whereas the Court’s Order dated January 29, 2013 granted the City and County of San 5 Francisco’s Motion to Dismiss and gave Plaintiffs forty-five (45) days to file an amended complaint; 6 Whereas Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is due on March 15, 2013; 7 Whereas the setting of the initial CMC for March 28, 2013 requires the parties to file ADR 8 forms and satisfy the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by March 7, 9 2013; 10 11 12 13 Whereas the parties are having difficulty satisfying the ADR and Rule 26(f) requirements in good faith because no complaint is currently on file in this action; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Plaintiffs and Defendants, subject to approval of the Court, that: 14 The Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued until June 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. 15 SO STIPULATED: 16 Dated: March 7, 2013 17 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS TARA M. STEELEY Deputy City Attorneys 18 19 20 21 By: s/Tara M. Steeley TARA M. STEELEY 22 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DAVID CHIU, SCOTT WIENER and ANGELA CALVILLO [in their official capacities] 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC 1 n:\govlit\li2013\130496\00832623.doc 1 Dated: March 7, 2013 2 CHRISTINA A. DIEDOARDO Law Offices of Christina DiEdoardo 3 4 5 By:Christina A. DiEdoardo CHRISTINA A. DIEDOARDO Attorney for Plaintiffs MITCH HIGHTOWER, OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB, GEORGE DAVIS, RUSSELL MILLS, ET AL. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC 2 n:\govlit\li2013\130496\00832623.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Initial Case Management Conference is hereby continued until 2 June 6, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. 4 7 RT H ER LI dwar Judge E Hon. Edward M. Chen 9 10 11 en d M. Ch NO 8 ERED O ORD IT IS S R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED. FO 6 S 3/12/13 UNIT ED Date: RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & PROP. ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL CMC CASE NO. C 12-5841-EMC 3 n:\govlit\li2013\130496\00832623.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?