Hightower et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 76

ORDER STAYING CASE for 60 DAYS, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 75 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF RUSSELL MILLS FROM THIS ACTION filed by George Davis, Oxane "Gypsy" Taub Case Manage ment Statement due by 7/17/2014. Further Case Management Conference/Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file second amended complaint set for 7/24/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/18/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN 345GROVE STREET TEL: 415-404-6615 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 FAX: 415-404-6616 8 9 D. GILL SPERLEIN, SBN 172887 THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN 345 Grove Street San Francisco, CA 94114 Telephone: (415) 404-6615 Facsimile: (415) 404-6616 gill@sperleinlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB and GEORGE DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 OXANE “GYPSY” TAUB and GEORGE DAVIS, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, and SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case № 3:12-cv-05841-EMC (NJV) STIPULATED REQUEST TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF RUSSELL MILLS FROM THIS ACTION 17 18 19 WHEREAS the Parties attended a settlement conference on March 12, 2014, during which they discussed a proposal that may allow the Parties to settle this action; 20 WHEREAS the Parties need additional time to consider that settlement proposal; 21 22 23 24 WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Vadas has agreed to continue to preside over any future settlement negotiations between the Parties; WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint is currently due 25 on March 31, 2014, with a hearing scheduled for May 8, 2014; 26 27 WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for May 8, 2014; 28 -1- 1 WHEREAS, Defendants agrees that Russell Mills has complied with his discovery 2 obligations, and therefore may be dismissed from this action according to the Court’s Order 3 dated July 18, 2013; 4 The Parties do thereby STIPULATE and AGREE to stay all aspects of the 5 6 7 proceedings for 60 days, and to dismiss Russell Mills from this action. The Parties hereby request that the Court enter the following Order. THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN 345GROVE STREET TEL: 415-404-6615 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 FAX: 415-404-6616 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: March 13, 2014 /s/ D. Gill Sperlein D. GILL SPERLEIN THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN Attorney for Plaintiffs Oxane Taub and George Davis Dated: March 13, 2014 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 By: /s/ Tara M. Steeley TARA M. STEELEY Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 The proceedings are hereby stayed for 60 days, during which time Magistrate Judge Vadas shall preside over any continued settlement negotiations. Discovery is stayed for 60 days. Plaintiffs’ deadline for filing a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint shall be extended to June 18, 2014, with that motion set for 7 hearing on July 24, 2014 at 1:30 pm. The Case Management Conference is hereby continued 9 10 to July 24, 2014 at 1:30 pm. Russell Mills is hereby dismissed as a Plaintiff in this action. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED 13 S 18 ER R NIA n M. Che H 20 RT 19 dward Judge E FO 17 LI 3/18/14 Dated: ________________ DERED SO OR IS IT_________________________________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN A 16 UNIT ED 15 RT U O 14 S DISTRICT TE C TA NO THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN 345GROVE STREET TEL: 415-404-6615 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 FAX: 415-404-6616 8 N 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?