Prentice v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Filing 17

ORDER re 16 In Person Discovery Conferences Letter filed by Nancy Prentice. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/13/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 Northern District of California 7 8 NANCY PRENTICE, 9 No. C 12-5856 MEJ Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: MEET & CONFER PROCEDURE 10 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 Defendant. _____________________________________/ 13 14 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ counsel’s request, filed May 2, 2013, regarding the in- 15 person meet and confer requirement for discovery disputes in this case. (Dkt. No. 16.) Good cause 16 appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ request to meet and confer by telephone and/or 17 video conference. So as to ensure compliance with the spirit of the meet and confer requirement, the 18 parties shall make a contemporaneous record of their meetings using a court reporter or electronic 19 recording device. The parties should be mindful that the Court may re-instate the in-person meeting 20 requirement if it determines that the alternative meetings are not fruitful. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 13, 2013 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?