Prentice v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Filing 24

ORDER re 21 Stipulation filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/17/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 B. CLYDE HUTCHINSON, State Bar No. 037526 bch@llcllp.com KARA A. ABELSON, State Bar No. 279320 kabelson@llcllp.com LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 Telephone: (510) 433-2600 Facsimile: (510) 433-2699 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION dba AMTRAK 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 NANCY PRENTICE and COLIN HAUGHIN, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, a District of Columbia corporation, Case No. C 12-05856 MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 18 19 Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation filed its Stipulated Request for 20 Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint on June 14, 21 2013. WHEREAS, good cause exists for the relief requested, the Court hereby grants Defendant's 22 Stipulated Request. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint no later than 23 June 25, 2013. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED June 17, 2013 Dated: ____________________ ______________________________ 27 Honorable Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge 28 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street Suite 2600 Oakland, CA 94612-3541 TEL: 510/433-2600 FAX: 510/433-2699 1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 13249-42416 KAA 624473.1 Case No. C 12-05856 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?