Prentice v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Filing
24
ORDER re 21 Stipulation filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/17/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
B. CLYDE HUTCHINSON, State Bar No. 037526
bch@llcllp.com
KARA A. ABELSON, State Bar No. 279320
kabelson@llcllp.com
LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP
Lake Merritt Plaza
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600
Oakland, CA 94612-3541
Telephone:
(510) 433-2600
Facsimile:
(510) 433-2699
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION dba AMTRAK
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
NANCY PRENTICE and COLIN
HAUGHIN,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, a
District of Columbia corporation,
Case No. C 12-05856 MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER
EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
18
19
Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation filed its Stipulated Request for
20
Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint on June 14,
21
2013. WHEREAS, good cause exists for the relief requested, the Court hereby grants Defendant's
22
Stipulated Request. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint no later than
23
June 25, 2013.
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED
June 17, 2013
Dated: ____________________
______________________________
27
Honorable Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
28
LOMBARDI, LOPER
& CONANT, LLP
Lake Merritt Plaza
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 2600
Oakland, CA 94612-3541
TEL: 510/433-2600
FAX: 510/433-2699
1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
13249-42416 KAA 624473.1
Case No. C 12-05856 MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?