Samuel et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Filing 4

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 3 Stipulation Extending Defendants' Time to Respond to Complaint. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)

1 Adam Brezine, California Bar No. 220852
BRYAN CAVE LLP
th
2 560 Mission Street, 25 Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone]
3 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
4 Email:
5 Attorneys for Defendants
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
6

Bryan Cave LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941105

7 Robert F. Samuel, Esq., California Bar No. 126928
8652 Timber Court
8 Orangevale, California, 95662
Telephone:
[phone]
[e-mail]
9 Email:
10 Attorney for Plaintiffs
ROBERT F. SAMUEL and PATRICIA A. SAMUEL
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16 ROBERT F. SAMUEL & PATRICIA A.
SAMUEL
17
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., a New York
20 Corporation DBA Citibank and Citigroup et
al.
21

CASE NO. C12-5871
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
[N.D. Local Rule 6-1(a)]

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83004.1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

STIPULATION

1

Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs Robert F. Samuel and Patricia

2

3 A. Samuel (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as
4 follows: Plaintiffs have granted Defendants an extension of time to respond to the Complaint up
5 to and including January 11, 2013. This change will not alter the date of any event or any
6 deadline already fixed by Court order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
8
9

Dated: December 21, 2012
Bryan Cave LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941105

10

Robert F. Samuel, Esq.

11
By:

/s/ Robert F. Samuel
Robert F. Samuel
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ROBERT F. SAMUEL and PATRICIA A.
SAMUEL

12
13
14
15
16
17

Dated: December 21, 2012

BRYAN CAVE LLP

18
By:

/s/ Adam Brezine
Adam Brezine
Attorneys for Defendant
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83004.1

1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Having reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiffs ROBERT F. SAMUEL, and PATRICIA A.

2

3 SAMUEL and Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and good cause appearing, the deadline for
4 Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to January l1, 2013.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
________________________________
C
TA
Judge of the United States District Court

UNIT
ED

S

January 2, 2013
7 Dated: _______________
8

RT

12

aria
Judge M

ER

14

A

H

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83004.1

FO

11

ames

-Elena J

NO

Bryan Cave LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941105

10

LI

9

R NIA

Northern District of California

2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

C