Samuel et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
Filing
4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 3 Stipulation Extending Defendants' Time to Respond to Complaint. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)
1 Adam Brezine, California Bar No. 220852
BRYAN CAVE LLP
th
2 560 Mission Street, 25 Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 268-2000
3 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(415) 268-1999
adam.brezine@bryancave.com
4 Email:
5 Attorneys for Defendants
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
6
Bryan Cave LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941105
7 Robert F. Samuel, Esq., California Bar No. 126928
8652 Timber Court
8 Orangevale, California, 95662
Telephone:
(916) 817-1654
rfsamuel99@yahoo.com
9 Email:
10 Attorney for Plaintiffs
ROBERT F. SAMUEL and PATRICIA A. SAMUEL
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16 ROBERT F. SAMUEL & PATRICIA A.
SAMUEL
17
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., a New York
20 Corporation DBA Citibank and Citigroup et
al.
21
CASE NO. C12-5871
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
[N.D. Local Rule 6-1(a)]
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83004.1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
STIPULATION
1
Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs Robert F. Samuel and Patricia
2
3 A. Samuel (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as
4 follows: Plaintiffs have granted Defendants an extension of time to respond to the Complaint up
5 to and including January 11, 2013. This change will not alter the date of any event or any
6 deadline already fixed by Court order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8
9
Dated: December 21, 2012
Bryan Cave LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941105
10
Robert F. Samuel, Esq.
11
By:
/s/ Robert F. Samuel
Robert F. Samuel
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ROBERT F. SAMUEL and PATRICIA A.
SAMUEL
12
13
14
15
16
17
Dated: December 21, 2012
BRYAN CAVE LLP
18
By:
/s/ Adam Brezine
Adam Brezine
Attorneys for Defendant
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83004.1
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Having reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiffs ROBERT F. SAMUEL, and PATRICIA A.
2
3 SAMUEL and Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and good cause appearing, the deadline for
4 Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to January l1, 2013.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
________________________________
C
TA
Judge of the United States District Court
UNIT
ED
S
January 2, 2013
7 Dated: _______________
8
RT
12
aria
Judge M
ER
14
A
H
13
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
83004.1
FO
11
ames
-Elena J
NO
Bryan Cave LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941105
10
LI
9
R NIA
Northern District of California
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?