Borg v. Ruskowski
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Defendant Pamela E. Roskowski (Erroneously Sued as "Pamela E. Ruskowski) with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP Rule 41. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 02/21/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ. (SBN: 099874)
CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ. (SBN: 122676)
STUBBS & LEONE
A Professional Corporation
2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 900
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 974-8600
Facsimile:
(925) 974-8601
E-mail: leonel@stubbsleone.com
leedc@stubbsleone.com
Attorneys for Defendant
PAMELA E. ROSKOWSKI (improperly referred to as “RUSKOWSKI”)
9
10
11
12
RANDOLPH E. DAAR, ESQ. (SBN: 88195)
506 Broadway
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone: (415) 986-5591
Facsimile: (415) 421-1331
E-mail: rdaar@pier5law.com
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ERIC BORG
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
Case No.: C 12 5877 TEH
ERIC BORG,
vs.
23
PAMELA E. RUSKOWSKI, UCSF CHIEF
OF POLICE, DOES 1-20
24
STIPULATION AND [PROSED ORDER]
DISMISSING DEFENDANT PAMELA E.
ROSKOWSKI (ERRONEOUSLY SUED
AS (“PAMELA E. RUSKOWSKI”) WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP
RULE 41
Defendants.
25
26
The parties to the above captioned litigation hereby stipulate by and through their
27
undersigned counsel of record to the following:
28
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case No. C 12 5877 TEH
1
1
IT IS STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above captioned litigation,
2
by and through their undersigned counsel of record, that the Defendant PAMELA E.
3
ROSKOWSKI (erroneously sued herein as “PAMELA RUSKOWSKI” be dismissed from
4
this action with prejudice.
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
6
7
Dated: February 19, 2013
STUBBS & LEONE
8
______/s/_____________________________
LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ.
CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ.
Attorney for Defendant
PAMELA E. ROSKOWKSI (erroneously sued
herein as PAMELA E. RUSKOWSKI”)
9
10
11
12
13
14
Dated: February 19, 2013
15
_______/s/____________________________
RANDOLPH E. DAAR, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff
ERIC BORG
16
17
18
LAW OFFICES OF RANDOLPH E. DAAR
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
R NIA
A
H
ER
FO
. He
helton E
Judge T
RT
24
nderson
NO
23
____________________________________
DISTRICT JUDGE THELTON HENDERSON
LI
22
RT
U
O
21
02/21/2013
Dated: ______________________
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
UNIT
ED
20
S
19
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case No. C 12 5877 TEH
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?