Cox v. Allin Corporation Plan et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DFTs AETNA LIFE AND DELL TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/11/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JORDAN S. ALTURA (SBN: 209431) SPENCER P. HUGRET (SBN: 240424) GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 jaltura@gordonrees.com shugret@gordonrees.com Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 7 8 9 10 LAURENCE F. PADWAY (SBN: 89314) THE LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY 1516 OAK STREET, SUIT 109 ALAMEDA, CA 94501 Telephone: (510) 814-6100 Facsimile: (510) 814-0650 lpadway@padway.com San Francisco, CA 94111 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 11 12 Attorney for Plaintiff ELGIN K. COX 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 23 ) CASE NO. C12-5880 JCS ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION EXTENDING THE ) TIME TO RESPOND TO vs. ) PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT ) PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 (a) ALLIN CORPORATION PLAN and UNUM LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DELL, ) INC. COMPREHENSIVE WELFARE BENEFITS ) PLAN, DELL, INC., ADMINISTRATION AND ) INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, AETNA LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 24 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 25 The parties hereto, Plaintiff Elgin Cox, Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) and 17 18 19 20 21 22 ELGIN K. COX, 26 Dell, Inc. and the Dell Inc. Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan (collectively hereinafter 27 “Dell”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 28 WHEREAS Aetna’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due to be filed on or before -1STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 1 2 3 December 10, 2012; WHEREAS Dell’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due to be filed on or around the same time; 4 WHEREAS Dell is in the process of retaining counsel to represent it in this matter; 5 WHEREAS Local Rule 6-1 (a) permits the parties to stipulate the extend the time to 6 7 respond to the Complaint without a Court Order; and WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to allow Aetna and Dell additional time to 8 respond to the Complaint, and Plaintiff’s counsel acknowledges that Dell’s request for additional 9 time to respond was communicated to Plaintiff’s counsel through Aetna’s counsel, as a courtesy 10 12 13 14 WHEREAS Aetna and Dell shall file and serve their responses to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before January 10, 2012. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 7, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY 15 By:__/S/_Laurence F. Padway_________ Laurence F. Padway Attorneys for Plaintiff ELGIN K. COX 16 17 18 Dated: December 7, 2012 GORDON & REES LLP 20 28 seph Judge Jo ER o C. Sper H 27 RT 26 NO 25 Dated: 12/11/12 A 24 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO R NIA 23 LI 22 RT U O S 21 By:__/S/____Spencer P. Hugret_______ Jordan S Altura Spencer P. Hugret Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 19 UNIT ED San Francisco, CA 94111 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 11 to Dell; N D IS T IC T R OF C -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 1 2 ECF CERTIFICATION I, Spencer P. Hugret, attorney for Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company, and the 3 ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation, hereby attests 4 that Laurence F. Padway, counsel for Plaintiff Elgin K. Cox authorized me to file to foregoing 5 and concurred in this filing. 6 Dated: December 7, 2012 GORDON & REES LLP 7 8 9 By:__/S/____Spencer P. Hugret_______ Jordan S Altura Spencer P. Hugret Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 10 San Francisco, CA 94111 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AETNA/1084587/14264881v.1 -3STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?