Cox v. Allin Corporation Plan et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DFTs AETNA LIFE AND DELL TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/11/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JORDAN S. ALTURA (SBN: 209431)
SPENCER P. HUGRET (SBN: 240424)
GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
jaltura@gordonrees.com
shugret@gordonrees.com
Attorneys for Defendant
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
7
8
9
10
LAURENCE F. PADWAY (SBN: 89314)
THE LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
1516 OAK STREET, SUIT 109
ALAMEDA, CA 94501
Telephone: (510) 814-6100
Facsimile: (510) 814-0650
lpadway@padway.com
San Francisco, CA 94111
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
11
12
Attorney for Plaintiff
ELGIN K. COX
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
23
) CASE NO. C12-5880 JCS
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION EXTENDING THE
) TIME TO RESPOND TO
vs.
) PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
) PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 (a)
ALLIN CORPORATION PLAN and UNUM LIFE )
INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DELL, )
INC. COMPREHENSIVE WELFARE BENEFITS )
PLAN, DELL, INC., ADMINISTRATION AND
)
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, AETNA LIFE
)
INSURANCE COMPANY,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
24
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
25
The parties hereto, Plaintiff Elgin Cox, Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) and
17
18
19
20
21
22
ELGIN K. COX,
26
Dell, Inc. and the Dell Inc. Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan (collectively hereinafter
27
“Dell”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
28
WHEREAS Aetna’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due to be filed on or before
-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
1
2
3
December 10, 2012;
WHEREAS Dell’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due to be filed on or around the
same time;
4
WHEREAS Dell is in the process of retaining counsel to represent it in this matter;
5
WHEREAS Local Rule 6-1 (a) permits the parties to stipulate the extend the time to
6
7
respond to the Complaint without a Court Order; and
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to allow Aetna and Dell additional time to
8
respond to the Complaint, and Plaintiff’s counsel acknowledges that Dell’s request for additional
9
time to respond was communicated to Plaintiff’s counsel through Aetna’s counsel, as a courtesy
10
12
13
14
WHEREAS Aetna and Dell shall file and serve their responses to Plaintiff’s Complaint
on or before January 10, 2012.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December 7, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F.
PADWAY
15
By:__/S/_Laurence F. Padway_________
Laurence F. Padway
Attorneys for Plaintiff ELGIN K. COX
16
17
18
Dated: December 7, 2012
GORDON & REES LLP
20
28
seph
Judge Jo
ER
o
C. Sper
H
27
RT
26
NO
25
Dated: 12/11/12
A
24
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
R NIA
23
LI
22
RT
U
O
S
21
By:__/S/____Spencer P. Hugret_______
Jordan S Altura
Spencer P. Hugret
Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
19
UNIT
ED
San Francisco, CA 94111
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
11
to Dell;
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
1
2
ECF CERTIFICATION
I, Spencer P. Hugret, attorney for Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company, and the
3
ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation, hereby attests
4
that Laurence F. Padway, counsel for Plaintiff Elgin K. Cox authorized me to file to foregoing
5
and concurred in this filing.
6
Dated: December 7, 2012
GORDON & REES LLP
7
8
9
By:__/S/____Spencer P. Hugret_______
Jordan S Altura
Spencer P. Hugret
Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
10
San Francisco, CA 94111
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AETNA/1084587/14264881v.1
-3STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?