Bite Tech, Inc et al v. X2 Impact, Inc

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 12/07/2012. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

CHRISTIAN E. PICONE, CA STATE BAR NO. 218275
KATHLEEN F. SHERMAN, CA STATE BAR NO. 241200
BERLINER COHEN
TEN ALMADEN BOULEVARD
ELEVENTH FLOOR
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95113 2233
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT X2 IMPACT, INC.
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

BITE TECH, INC., a Minnesota corporation,
and CUSTMBITE LLC, a New Jersey limited
liability corporation,

15

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

13
14

CASE NO. C12 5888

v.
X2 IMPACT, INC., a Washington corporation,
Defendant.

16
17
18

ORDER

19

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause, it is hereby ordered that:

20

1. Defendant has up to and including December 26, 2012 to move, plead, or otherwise

DATED: ___________, 2012
December 7

26
27

NO

NATHANAEL COUSINS, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
s
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAousin
ael M. C

28

1

Judge Na

ER

H

ORDER

RT

CASE NO. C12 5888
\CEP\1126780.2
120612 NEWNEW

VED
APPRO

R NIA

UNIT
ED

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

24

Defendant’s substantive or procedural rights or defenses.

than

FO

23

2. Nothing in this stipulation shall constitute a waiver or otherwise prejudice Plaintiffs’ or

LI

22

respond to the Complaint.

A

21

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C