Bite Tech, Inc et al v. X2 Impact, Inc

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 12/07/2012. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 CHRISTIAN E. PICONE, CA STATE BAR NO. 218275 KATHLEEN F. SHERMAN, CA STATE BAR NO. 241200 BERLINER COHEN TEN ALMADEN BOULEVARD ELEVENTH FLOOR SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95113 2233 TELEPHONE: (408) 286 5800 FACSIMILE: (408) 998 5388 6 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT X2 IMPACT, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 BITE TECH, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and CUSTMBITE LLC, a New Jersey limited liability corporation, 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, 13 14 CASE NO. C12 5888 v. X2 IMPACT, INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant. 16 17 18 ORDER 19 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause, it is hereby ordered that: 20 1. Defendant has up to and including December 26, 2012 to move, plead, or otherwise DATED: ___________, 2012 December 7 26 27 NO NATHANAEL COUSINS, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE s NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAousin ael M. C 28 1 Judge Na ER H ORDER RT CASE NO. C12 5888 \CEP\1126780.2 120612 NEWNEW VED APPRO R NIA UNIT ED 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S 24 Defendant’s substantive or procedural rights or defenses. than FO 23 2. Nothing in this stipulation shall constitute a waiver or otherwise prejudice Plaintiffs’ or LI 22 respond to the Complaint. A 21 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?