Green v. Taylor et al
Filing
97
ORDER GRANTING re 96 Proposed Order Excusing Plaintiff Raymond A. Green's Personal Attendance from Settlement Conference filed by Raymond A. Green. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/4/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)
1
5
Steven N. Williams (175489)
Elizabeth Tran (280502)
COTCHETT PITRE & McCARTHY LLP
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, CA 94010
Telephone: (650) 697-6000
Facsimile: (650) 697-0577
swilliams@cpmlegal.com
etran@cpmlegal.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond A. Green
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
RAYMOND A. GREEN, E68189,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC
APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A.
GREEN’S PERSONAL ATTENDANCE
FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
B. AGUIRRE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP
APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S
PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC
1
Counsel for Plaintiff Raymond A. Green submits this application to excuse Mr. Green’s
2
personal attendance from the settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on
3
March 9, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. Pursuant to Magistrate Judge Spero’s Notice of Settlement Conference
4
and Settlement Conference Order, “Personal attendance of a party representative will rarely be
5
excused by the Court, and then only upon separate written application demonstrating substantial
6
hardship served on opposing counsel and lodged as early as the basis for the hardship is known but
7
no later than the Settlement Conference Statement” (ECF No. 95).
8
Counsel for Plaintiff previously discussed this issue with defense counsel and requested
9
Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley waive the attendance requirement for Mr. Green given
10
that Plaintiff is currently a prisoner at Wasco State Prison in Wasco, California and attendance
11
would pose a substantial hardship (ECF No. 94). Counsel for Plaintiff has coordinated with Wasco
12
State Prison’s Litigation Coordinator, however, to make Plaintiff available by phone during the
13
settlement conference, if necessary. The Litigation Coordinator, Tracy Jackson, represented to
14
counsel for Plaintiff that counsel for Plaintiff may call her during the settlement conference, and she
15
can connect counsel for Plaintiff to Mr. Green. She stated that Mr. Green cannot attend the entire
16
settlement conference by phone due to limited staffing and resource issues at Wasco State Prison.
17
Counsel for Plaintiff therefore renew their request to excuse Mr. Green’s personal attendance
18
from the settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Spero.
19
Dated: March 3, 2016
20
21
22
23
24
25
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Elizabeth Tran
Joseph W. Cotchett (36324)
Elizabeth Tran (280502)
Joyce Chang (300780)
COTCHETT PITRE & McCARTHY LLP
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, CA 94010
Telephone: (650) 697-6000
Facsimile: (650) 697-0577
jcotchett@cpmlegal.com
etran@cpmlegal.com
jchang@cpmlegal.com
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond A. Green
27
28
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP
APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S
PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC
1
PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE is approved.
8
NO
6
pero
S
seph C.
_________________________________
E
C
JOSEPH C.RSPERO
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
H
10
Dated: March __, 2016
4
RT
9
Judge Jo
R NIA
S
7
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
UNIT
ED
5
FO
4
LI
3
The above APPLICATION EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S
A
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP
APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S
PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?