Green v. Taylor et al

Filing 97

ORDER GRANTING re 96 Proposed Order Excusing Plaintiff Raymond A. Green's Personal Attendance from Settlement Conference filed by Raymond A. Green. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/4/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 5 Steven N. Williams (175489) Elizabeth Tran (280502) COTCHETT PITRE & McCARTHY LLP 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 swilliams@cpmlegal.com etran@cpmlegal.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond A. Green 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 RAYMOND A. GREEN, E68189, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE B. AGUIRRE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC 1 Counsel for Plaintiff Raymond A. Green submits this application to excuse Mr. Green’s 2 personal attendance from the settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3 March 9, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. Pursuant to Magistrate Judge Spero’s Notice of Settlement Conference 4 and Settlement Conference Order, “Personal attendance of a party representative will rarely be 5 excused by the Court, and then only upon separate written application demonstrating substantial 6 hardship served on opposing counsel and lodged as early as the basis for the hardship is known but 7 no later than the Settlement Conference Statement” (ECF No. 95). 8 Counsel for Plaintiff previously discussed this issue with defense counsel and requested 9 Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley waive the attendance requirement for Mr. Green given 10 that Plaintiff is currently a prisoner at Wasco State Prison in Wasco, California and attendance 11 would pose a substantial hardship (ECF No. 94). Counsel for Plaintiff has coordinated with Wasco 12 State Prison’s Litigation Coordinator, however, to make Plaintiff available by phone during the 13 settlement conference, if necessary. The Litigation Coordinator, Tracy Jackson, represented to 14 counsel for Plaintiff that counsel for Plaintiff may call her during the settlement conference, and she 15 can connect counsel for Plaintiff to Mr. Green. She stated that Mr. Green cannot attend the entire 16 settlement conference by phone due to limited staffing and resource issues at Wasco State Prison. 17 Counsel for Plaintiff therefore renew their request to excuse Mr. Green’s personal attendance 18 from the settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Spero. 19 Dated: March 3, 2016 20 21 22 23 24 25 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Elizabeth Tran Joseph W. Cotchett (36324) Elizabeth Tran (280502) Joyce Chang (300780) COTCHETT PITRE & McCARTHY LLP 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 jcotchett@cpmlegal.com etran@cpmlegal.com jchang@cpmlegal.com 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond A. Green 27 28 LAW OFFICES COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC 1 PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE is approved. 8 NO 6 pero S seph C. _________________________________ E C JOSEPH C.RSPERO N F D IS T IC T O R UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE H 10 Dated: March __, 2016 4 RT 9 Judge Jo R NIA S 7 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T UNIT ED 5 FO 4 LI 3 The above APPLICATION EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S A 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCUSING PLAINTIFF RAYMOND A. GREEN’S PERSONAL ATTENDANCE FROM SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No. 3:12-cv-05933-JSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?