Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. v. Alumni Association Of Chi Theta Chi House
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE re 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE filed by Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc., Alumni Association Of Chi Theta Chi House. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on January 15, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Robert N. Phillips (SBN 120970)
Tiffany M. Bui (SBN 281339)
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Email: robphillips@reedsmith.com
Email: tbui@reedsmith.com
Telephone:
Facsimile:
+1 415 543 8700
+1 415 391 8269
Attorneys for Defendant
Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
vs.
Case No. C-12-5942-JSC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS
WITH PREJUDICE
Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House,
a/k/a Chi Theta Chi, and Does 1 through 50,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C-12-5942-JSC
US_ACTIVE-111579225.2
JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure, the parties
hereby jointly stipulate to dismiss all claims in this action WITH PREJUDICE, as follows:
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2012, Plaintiff Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. (“Theta Chi”) filed a
4
Complaint, asserting various claims against Defendant Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House
5
(“Alumni Association”), including: federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, state
6
trademark dilution, unfair competition, and misappropriation;
7
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2012, Alumni Association removed this action from the Santa
8
Clara County Superior Court, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
9
California;
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, this Court entered an order granting Alumni Association
11
an extension of time to respond to initial complaint to January 14, 2013, in order to allow the parties
12
to engage in settlement negotiations;
13
14
WHEREAS, the parties were subsequently able to reach an agreement settling all claims in
this litigation and have entered into a settlement agreement;
15
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED, by and between
16
the parties, that all claims by the parties in this litigation be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each
17
side to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.
18
19
The parties further stipulate that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’
settlement agreement as necessary and to the fullest extent provided by law.
20
21
Dated: January 14, 2013
22
23
24
25
26
By:
/s/ Robert N. Phillips
Robert N. Phillips, Cal. Bar No. 120970
Tiffany M. Bui, Cal. Bar No. 281339
Reed Smith LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, California 94105-3659
Email: robphillips@reedsmith.com
Email: tbui@reedsmith.com
Telephone: (415) 543-8700
Facsimile: (415) 391-8269
Attorneys for Defendant
Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House
27
28
Case No. C-12-5942-JSC
-1JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
US_ACTIVE-111579225.2
1
2
Dated: January 14, 2013
By:
3
4
5
6
7
Raoul D. Kennedy
Raoul D. Kennedy, Cal. Bar. No. 40892
James P. Schaefer, Cal. Bar. No. 250417
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1100
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: (650) 471-4500
Facsimile: (650) 470-4570
Email: chris.kennedy@skadden.com
Email: james.schaefer@skadden.com
8
Christopher G. Oprison
Pro Hac Vice application pending
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
1440 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 372-7000
Facsimile: (202) 661-0595
Email: christopher.oprison@skadden.com
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
William W. Palmer, Cal. Bar. No. 146404
Law Offices of William W. Palmer
575 University Ave. #100
Sacramento, California 95825
Telephone: (916) 564-4458
Facsimile: (916) 564-5758
Email: wpalmer@palmercorp.com
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc.
19
20
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
21
22
23
24
I, Robert N. Phillips, attest that I am one of the attorneys for Defendant Alumni Association
of Chi Theta Chi House, and, as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that, pursuant to
United States District Court, Northern District of California Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from Counsel for Plaintiff Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc.
Dated: January 14, 2013
25
By:
/s/ Robert N. Phillips
Robert N. Phillips
26
27
28
Case No. C-12-5942-JSC
-2JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
1
[PROPOSED ORDER
RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
2
3
4
The Court, having reviewed the above Stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFOR, hereby orders as follows:
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
6
Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of the parties, all claims in this litigation are hereby
and to the fullest extend provided by law.
S
14
15
Jud
c ot t C o
H
ER
eline S
ge J a c qu
16
17
rley
R NIA
13
UNIT
ED
12
__________________________________________
D
HONORABLE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
RDERE
UNITED IS SO OMAGISTRATE JUDGE
STATES
IT
RT
REED SMITH LLP
Dated: January 15, 2013
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
11
NO
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
FO
9
The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ Settlement Agreement as necessary
LI
8
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
A
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C-12-5942-JSC
-1JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
US_ACTIVE-111579225.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?