Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. v. Alumni Association Of Chi Theta Chi House

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE re 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE filed by Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc., Alumni Association Of Chi Theta Chi House. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on January 15, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Robert N. Phillips (SBN 120970) Tiffany M. Bui (SBN 281339) REED SMITH LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105-3659 Email: robphillips@reedsmith.com Email: tbui@reedsmith.com Telephone: Facsimile: +1 415 543 8700 +1 415 391 8269 Attorneys for Defendant Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 vs. Case No. C-12-5942-JSC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House, a/k/a Chi Theta Chi, and Does 1 through 50, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C-12-5942-JSC US_ACTIVE-111579225.2 JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure, the parties hereby jointly stipulate to dismiss all claims in this action WITH PREJUDICE, as follows: WHEREAS, on October 30, 2012, Plaintiff Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. (“Theta Chi”) filed a 4 Complaint, asserting various claims against Defendant Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House 5 (“Alumni Association”), including: federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, state 6 trademark dilution, unfair competition, and misappropriation; 7 WHEREAS, on November 20, 2012, Alumni Association removed this action from the Santa 8 Clara County Superior Court, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of 9 California; REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, this Court entered an order granting Alumni Association 11 an extension of time to respond to initial complaint to January 14, 2013, in order to allow the parties 12 to engage in settlement negotiations; 13 14 WHEREAS, the parties were subsequently able to reach an agreement settling all claims in this litigation and have entered into a settlement agreement; 15 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED, by and between 16 the parties, that all claims by the parties in this litigation be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each 17 side to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 18 19 The parties further stipulate that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement as necessary and to the fullest extent provided by law. 20 21 Dated: January 14, 2013 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Robert N. Phillips Robert N. Phillips, Cal. Bar No. 120970 Tiffany M. Bui, Cal. Bar No. 281339 Reed Smith LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, California 94105-3659 Email: robphillips@reedsmith.com Email: tbui@reedsmith.com Telephone: (415) 543-8700 Facsimile: (415) 391-8269 Attorneys for Defendant Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House 27 28 Case No. C-12-5942-JSC -1JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE US_ACTIVE-111579225.2 1 2 Dated: January 14, 2013 By: 3 4 5 6 7 Raoul D. Kennedy Raoul D. Kennedy, Cal. Bar. No. 40892 James P. Schaefer, Cal. Bar. No. 250417 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 471-4500 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 Email: chris.kennedy@skadden.com Email: james.schaefer@skadden.com 8 Christopher G. Oprison Pro Hac Vice application pending Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 372-7000 Facsimile: (202) 661-0595 Email: christopher.oprison@skadden.com 9 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 12 13 William W. Palmer, Cal. Bar. No. 146404 Law Offices of William W. Palmer 575 University Ave. #100 Sacramento, California 95825 Telephone: (916) 564-4458 Facsimile: (916) 564-5758 Email: wpalmer@palmercorp.com 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. 19 20 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE 21 22 23 24 I, Robert N. Phillips, attest that I am one of the attorneys for Defendant Alumni Association of Chi Theta Chi House, and, as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that, pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Counsel for Plaintiff Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. Dated: January 14, 2013 25 By: /s/ Robert N. Phillips Robert N. Phillips 26 27 28 Case No. C-12-5942-JSC -2JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 1 [PROPOSED ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2 3 4 The Court, having reviewed the above Stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, hereby orders as follows: 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 6 Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of the parties, all claims in this litigation are hereby and to the fullest extend provided by law. S 14 15 Jud c ot t C o H ER eline S ge J a c qu 16 17 rley R NIA 13 UNIT ED 12 __________________________________________ D HONORABLE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY RDERE UNITED IS SO OMAGISTRATE JUDGE STATES IT RT REED SMITH LLP Dated: January 15, 2013 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 11 NO A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 FO 9 The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ Settlement Agreement as necessary LI 8 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. A 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C-12-5942-JSC -1JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE US_ACTIVE-111579225.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?