Roybal-de-Aguero v. Wells Fargo, N.A.

Filing 39

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 38 Ex Parte Application to Reopen Case. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO REOPEN CASE

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. CV 12-05977 CRB

FEDELINA ROYBAL-DE-AGUERO,

v.
WELLS FARGO NA,

15

Defendant.

/

16

Two years ago, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s case with prejudice pursuant to Federal

17
18

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), see Order (dkt. 21); Judgment (dkt. 22), and granted

19

Defendant’s unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees, see Order (dkt. 28). Shortly thereafter,

20

the Court denied Plaintiff’s first Motion to Reopen. See Order (dkt. 36). Plaintiff has now

21

filed a document entitled “EX PARTE APPLICATION TO RE-OPEN AND CLERKS[’]

22

REMAND CORRECT PARTIES AS LISTED ON CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Case

23

Management Conference Ex Parte Motion to Consolidate [Proposed] Order.”

24

See Application (dkt. 38).
The Court cannot discern any legal basis for reopening the case or for making the

25
26

//

27

//

28

//

1
2

changes Plaintiff requests. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Application.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 19, 2015

5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2