Miller v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Filing 17

ORDER granting 15 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Southwest Airlines Co. and Plaintiffs filed by Southwest Airlines Co.. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Deadline pndng outcome of P's class certification motion. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/12/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-05978-CRB Document15 Filed02/11/13 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT MILLER, on behalf of himself and all QfjterS_imilar11c, Plaintiff(s), CASE NO. Q12-5978-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS V. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., a Texas corporation, Defendant(s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R, 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR LR. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference, See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) private mediation pending the outcome of Plaintiffs class certification motion. The parties will then meet nd confe Liii The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: L........the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case loan ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) LJ other requested deadline Dated: February 1’ 2013 for Plaintiff rver _LE - Eric Grover Dated: February Ii, 2013 (I.,- T1LuLu Attorney for Defendant Baker & McKenzie LLP Colin H. Murray CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE NOCAORG Case3:12-cv-05978-CRB Document15 Filed02/11/13 Page2 of 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. D RDERE O ODISTRICT UNITED STATES IT IS S JUDGE R NIA February 12, 2013 UNIT ED Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S LX F- - 1 CHARLES R. BREYER yer A H LI RT ER FO NO s R. Bre harle Judge C N F D IS T IC T O R C When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?