Nicolow v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filing 94

ORDER granting PGGMs selection of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP as Lead Counsel for the Class pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v) re 93 Response ( Non Motion ) filed by PGGM Vermogensbeheer B.V.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/7/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, CLASS ACTION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Master File No. C-12-5980 CRB This Document Relates To: All Actions ORDER APPROVING LEAD PLAINTIFF’S SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL 1 Having considered Lead Plaintiff PGGM Vermogensbeheer B.V.’s (“PGGM”) Response 2 to the Court’s March 4, 2013 Order Consolidating Cases, Appointing Lead Plaintiffs, and 3 Appointing Lead Counsel and Interim Lead Counsel, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Class is approved pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v). 7 UNIT ED O OR IT IS S har Judge C DERED 11 LI ER H 14 RT 13 reyer les R. B A 12 R NIA 10 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER NO 9 DATED: March 7, 2013 RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA ______________________________________ FO 6 PGGM’s selection of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP as Lead Counsel for the S 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING LEAD PLAINTIFF’S SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL Master File No. C-12-5980 CRB -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?