Manzanillo v. Lewis et al

Filing 178

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 10/2/2015. Fact discovery cut-off 6/3/2016. Expert disclosures 6/24/2016. Expert rebuttal 7/15/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 7/29/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 8/ 19/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 11/1/2016. Pretrial Conference set for 11/10/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 12/5/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

RAYMOND J. MANZANILLO,

Case No. 12-cv-05983-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

GREGORY D. LEWIS, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

October 2, 2015

Fact discovery cut-off

June 3, 2016

20

Expert disclosures

June 24, 2016

21

Expert rebuttal

July 15, 2016

22

Expert discovery cut-off

July 29, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions

August 19, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due

November 1, 2016

Pretrial conference

November 10, 2016
at 2:00 p.m.

Trial

December 5, 2016 at
8:30 a.m.

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

4

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

5

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

6

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

7

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

9

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

10

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

to grant a continuance.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 4, 2016

14
15
16

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2