Friends of Oceano Dunes, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Interior et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by Daniel M. Ashe, Ken Salazar, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on December 20, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)

1
2
3

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
REBECCA FALK (CSBN 226798)
Assistant United States Attorney

4
5
6

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]

7
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
FRIENDS OF OCEANO DUNES, INC.,
13
14
15
16
17
18

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, )
the UNITED STATES FISH AND
)
WILDLIFE SERVICE, KEN SALAZAR, in )
)
his official capacity as Secretary of the
Interior, and DANIEL M. ASHE, in his
official capacity as Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service,

No. 12-05998 JSC
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

19
Defendants.
20
21

Defendants United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife

22

Service, Ken Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, and Daniel M. Ashe, in

23

his official capacity as the Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Defendants”) and

24

Plaintiff Friends of Oceano Dunes, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel,

25

stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Civil

26

Local Rule 6-1(a) of the Northern District of California, as follows:

27
28

1.

On November 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Complaint re Failure to Produce

Records and Grant Fee Waiver in Violation of the Freedom of Information Act (“Complaint”);
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. C 12-05998 JCS

1
2
3
4
5
6

2.

On November 30, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office received a copy of Plaintiff’s

Complaint by personal service;
3.

Pursuant to Rule 12(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants’

response to the Complaint is presently due to be filed and served on December 31, 2012;
4.

The parties have agreed to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to the

Complaint from December 31, 2012 to January 7, 2013;

7

5.

No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted; and

8

6.

This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

9
10
11

Court order.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants
that Defendants will have until January 7, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

12
13

DATED: December 18, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

14
15
____/s/ Thomas D. Roth_______
Thomas D. Roth
Attorneys for Plaintiff

16
17
18
19

DATED: December 18, 2012

20

Respectfully submitted,
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

21
____/s/ Rebecca Falk____________
REBECCA FALK
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants

22
23
24
25

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

DATED: December 20, 2012

_______________________________________
HONORABLE JACQUELINE S. CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. C 12-05998 JCS