Riccardi v. Lynch et al

Filing 156

ORDER granting 155 STIPULATION re: Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Derivative Settlement filed by Stanley Morrical. Reset Hearing as to 149 MOTION for Settlement (Preliminary Approval of D erivative Settlement). Motion for Preliminary Approval Hearing reset for 8/25/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/16/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014)

Case3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document155 Filed07/16/14 Page1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (Cal. SBN 36324)
[e-mail]
MARK C. MOLUMPHY (Cal. SBN 168009)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW K. EDLING (Cal. SBN: 250940)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER R. CRUTCHFIELD (Cal. SBN: 275343)
[e-mail]
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, CA 94010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10

Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Stanley Morrical,
derivatively on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15

IN RE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

16
17
18
19
20
21

Master File NO. C-12-6003-CRB

ALL ACTIONS

STIPULATION AND ORDER
RE: HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT
Date: August 21, 2014
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Dept.: Courtroom 6, 17th Floor
Hon. Charles R. Breyer

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP

STIPULATION RE: HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT; Master File No. C-12-6003-CRB

Case3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document155 Filed07/16/14 Page2 of 5

STIPULATION

1
2

WHEREAS, on June 30, 2014, Plaintiff Stanley Morrical (“Federal Plaintiff”) filed a

3

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Derivative Settlement (“Motion”) with a hearing set on

4

August 29, 2014; and

5
6
7

WHEREAS, the Court had a conflict on August 29, 2014, and reset the hearing to August
21, 2014; and
WHEREAS, because one of the primary attorneys involved in this matter has a scheduling

8

conflict on August 21, 2014, the parties desire to reset the hearing to August 25, 26 or 27, 2014,

9

and are available at any time on August 25 and 26, including early in the morning or late in the

10
11
12

afternoon, and available in the morning of August 27; and
WHEREAS, in the event the Court is unavailable on August 25, 26 or 27, 2014, the
parties agree that the hearing should remain on August 21, 2014,

13

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED

14

AND AGREED by and among the parties below, through their undersigned counsel of record,

15

that the hearing on the Motion be reset from August 21, 2014 to August 25, 26 or 27, 2014, at

16

such time that is available and convenient to the Court.

17
18
19

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: July 16, 2014
/s/ Mark C. Molumphy
Mark C. Molumphy

20
21
22
23
24
25

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, CA 94010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Stanley Morrical,
derivatively on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company

26
27
28
v
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP

________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION RE: HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT; Master File No. C-12-6003-CRB

Case3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document155 Filed07/16/14 Page3 of 5

1

Dated: July 16, 2014

2

/s/ Marc Wolinsky
Marc Wolinsky

6

WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company

3
4
5

8
9

Dated: July 16, 2014
10
11

/s/ John C. Dwyer
John C. Dwyer
COOLEY LLP
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Defendant Margaret C. Whitman
16
17
18

Dated: July 16, 2014

/s/ Timothy A. Miller
Timothy A. Miller

19
20
21
22
23

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM
LLP
525 University Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

24
25
26
27
28
v
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Raymond J. Lane, Shumeet
Banerji, Rajiv L. Gupta, John H. Hammergren, Marc
L. Andreessen, Patricia F. Russo, Ann M. Livermore,
Gary M. Reiner, G. Kennedy Thompson, Ralph V.
Whitworth, Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr., Sari M. Baldauf,
and Dominique Senequier
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION RE: HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT; Master File No. C-12-6003-CRB

Case3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document155 Filed07/16/14 Page4 of 5

1
2

Dated: July 16, 2014

/s/ Bruce E. Yannett
Bruce E. Yannett

3

DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
919 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendant Léo Apotheker

8
9
10

Dated: July 16, 2014

11

/s/ Daniel Bookin
Daniel Bookin

15

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

16

Attorneys for Defendant Shane Robison

12
13
14

17
18

Dated: July 16, 2014
19
20
21
22
23

/s/ Brian T. Frawley
Brian T. Frawley
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

24

Attorneys for Defendant Barclays Capital
25
26
27
28
v
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP

________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION RE: HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT; Master File No. C-12-6003-CRB

Case3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document155 Filed07/16/14 Page5 of 5

1

Dated: July 16, 2014

2

/s/ Alan S. Goudiss
Alan S. Goudiss
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendant Defendant Perella Weinberg
Partners

8
9
10
11

August 25, 2014
9:30 a.m.
reset to _________________________ at ________________.

21

J

ER

H

20

RT

19

R NIA

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

18

DERE

O OR
IT IS S

FO

17

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
D

UNIT
ED

16

July 15,2014
Date: _________________.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

15

S

14

LI

13

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on the Motion is

A

12

ORDER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT, PITRE
& MCCARTHY, LLP

________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION RE: HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT; Master File No. C-12-6003-CRB