Hegar et al v. Panetta

Filing 72

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 71 For Continuance filed by Ashton Carter Case Management Statement due by 3/3/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/10/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)

Download PDF
1 ROSEMARIE T. RING (SBN 220769) rose.ring@mto.com 2 MARI OVERBECK (SBN 261707) mari.overbeck@mto.com 3 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street 4 Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2907 5 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 6 CHRISTINE P. SUN (SBN 218701) 7 csun@aclunc.org ELIZABETH O. GILL (SBN 218311) 8 egill@aclunc.org AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 9 FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. 10 39 Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 94111 11 Telephone: (415) 621-2493 Facsimile: (415) 255-8437 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 BENJAMIN MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General BRIAN STRETCH Acting United States Attorney ALEX TSE Chief, Civil Division ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Deputy Branch Director CAROLINE LEWIS WOLVERTON caroline.lewis-wolverton@usdoj.gov District of Columbia Bar No. 496433 Senior Trial Counsel Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 883 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: (202) 514-0265 Facsimile: (202) 616-8470 Attorneys for Defendant ASHTON B. CARTER 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 MARY JENNINGS HEGAR, JENNIFER HUNT, ALEXANDRA ZOE BEDELL, 19 COLLEEN FARRELL, AND SERVICE WOMEN’S ACTION NETWORK, 20 Plaintiffs, 21 vs. 22 ASHTON B. CARTER, Secretary of Defense, 23 Defendant. 24 Case No. 12-CV-06005 EMC STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CMC and UPDATED CMC STATEMENT Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Case Management Conference: Feb. 18, 2016 Time: 10:30 a.m. 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 12-6005 EMC STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 STIPULATION Plaintiffs Mary Jennings Hegar, Jennifer Hunt, Alexandra Zoe Bedell, Colleen Farrell and 3 Service Women’s Action Network and Defendant Ashton B. Carter, Secretary of Defense 4 (“Secretary”) (collectively, “the parties”), by and through their respective counsel, submit this 5 Stipulated Request and Proposed Order for a continuance of the deadline for the parties’ updated 6 joint Case Management Conference (CMC) Statement to February 25, 2016, and further CMC to 7 March 3, 2016. The joint CMC Statement is currently due February 11, 2016, and the further 8 CMC is currently scheduled for February 18, 2016. Defendant submits that the following facts 9 and circumstances set forth in the attached Declaration of counsel for Defendant Caroline Lewis 10 Wolverton establish good cause for the requested continuance as follows: 11 1. On November 20, 2015, the Court scheduled a further CMC in this matter for 12 February 18, 2016. ECF No. 67 (Nov. Nov. 20, 2015). 13 2. Subsequently, Ms. Wolverton’s son was selected for his middle school musical and 14 the musical was scheduled for the evening February 18, 2016. As the musical will be in Bethesda, 15 Maryland, Ms. Wolverton would not be able to return from San Francisco on February 18 in time 16 to attend the musical. 17 3. In light of the foregoing, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court continue 18 the deadline for the further CMC to March 3, 2016 and the parties’ updated joint CMC Statement 19 to February 25, 2016. Defendant requested and received Plaintiffs’ stipulation to this request. 20 21 DATED: February 4, 2016 22 23 24 BENJAMIN MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General BRIAN STRETCH Acting United States Attorney ALEX TSE Chief, Civil Division ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Deputy Branch Director 25 26 27 28 /s/ Caroline Lewis Wolverton CAROLINE LEWIS WOLVERTON U.S. Department of Justice Attorneys for Defendant ASHTON B. CARTER CASE NO. C-12-6005 EMC STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 DATED: February 4, 2016 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 /s/ Rosemarie T. Ring ROSEMARIE T. RING Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARY JENNINGS HEGAR, JENNIFER HUNT, ALEXANDRA ZOE BEDELL, COLLEEN FARRELL, AND SERVICE WOMEN’S ACTION NETWORK 6 7 8 Additional Counsel: 9 STEVEN M. PERRY (SBN 106154) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 10 355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 11 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 12 Email: steven.perry@mto.com 13 LENORA M. LAPIDUS [pro hac vice] AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION WOMEN’S RIGHTS PROJECT 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 Telephone: (212) 549-2668 Facsimile: (212) 549-2480 Email: Llapidus@aclu.org 14 15 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 16 17 18 19 20 I, Caroline Lewis Wolverton, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order for Continuance of Further Case Management Conference and Updated Case Management Statement. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that all signatories have concurred in this filing. 21 22 /s/ Caroline Lewis Wolverton 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. C-12-6005 EMC STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulated request, and based on good cause shown, it is hereby 3 ORDERED that the Stipulated Request for Continuance of Further Case Management 4 Conference and Updated Case Management Statement is hereby GRANTED; and it is further 5 ORDERED that the Further Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED to 10 6 March 3, 2016; and it is further 7 ORDERED that the deadline for the parties’ Updated Joint CMC Statement is March 3, 2016 8 CONTINUED to February 25, 2016. 9 16 R NIA en ER FO LI dwar Judge E A H 15 O IT IS S IFIED S MOD A d M. Ch RT 14 HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN United States ORDERED District Judge NO 13 UNIT ED 12 RT U O 11 S 2/9/16 10 Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. C-12-6005 EMC STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?