Martinez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 27

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/21/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RAUL MARTINEZ, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-12-6006 EMC WELLS FARGO BANK, 12 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Defendant. ___________________________________/ 13 14 15 16 17 18 ( ) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in accordance with the 19 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND; AND DENYING 20 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT filed on May 21, 2013. The Clerk of the 21 Court is directed to close the file in this case. 22 23 Dated: May 21, 2013 24 25 26 27 28 EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?