Martinez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
27
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/21/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
RAUL MARTINEZ, et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-12-6006 EMC
WELLS FARGO BANK,
12
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendant.
___________________________________/
13
14
15
16
17
18
( ) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have
been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues
have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in accordance with the
19
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND; AND DENYING
20
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT filed on May 21, 2013. The Clerk of the
21
Court is directed to close the file in this case.
22
23
Dated: May 21, 2013
24
25
26
27
28
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?