Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
41
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE., Motions terminated: 30 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A... Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/11/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
Jonathan D. Selbin (State Bar No. 170222)
jselbin@lchb.com
Douglas Cuthbertson (admitted pro hac vice)
dcuthbertson@lchb.com
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Telephone: (212) 355-9500
Facsimile: (212) 355-9592
MEYER WILSON CO., LPA
Matthew R. Wilson
(admitted pro hac vice)
mwilson@meyerwilson.com
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
1320 Dublin Road, Ste. 100
BERNSTEIN, LLP
Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458) Columbus, Ohio 43215
Telephone: (614) 224-6000
dhutchinson@lchb.com
Facsimile: (614) 224-6066
Nicole D. Reynolds (State Bar No. 246255)
nreynolds@lchb.com
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
Abbas Kazerounian (State Bar No. 249203)
San Francisco, California 94111-3339
ak@kazlg.com
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
S. Mohammad Kazerouni (State Bar No. 252835)
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
mike@kazlg.com
Assal Assassi (State Bar No. 274249)
HYDE & SWIGART
assal@kazlg.com
Robert L. Hyde (State Bar No. 227183)
2700 North Main Street, Suite 1000
bob@westcostlitigation.com
Santa Ana, CA 92866
Joshua Swigart (State Bar No. 225557)
Telephone: (800) 400-6806
josh@westcoastlitigation.com
Facsimile: (800) 520-5523
411 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92108-3551
Telephone: (619) 233-7770
Facsimile: (619) 297-1022
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
the Proposed Class
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION
20
21
22
23
MADELINE MARTIN, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
24
v.
25
26
Case No. 3:12-cv-06030-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendants.
27
28
1079087.1
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI
1
2
Plaintiff Madeline Martin (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells
Fargo”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
3
WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, Wells Fargo filed a motion to stay and dismiss this action
4
and compel Plaintiff to arbitrate her claims as an individual (Dkt. No. 30) (“Motion to Compel
5
Arbitration”);
6
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2013, pursuant to Stipulation and Order (Dkt. No. 26), Plaintiff
7
served 13 arbitration-related requests for production of documents (“RFPs”) and seven
8
interrogatories (“ROGs”), and also proposed to depose the two Wells Fargo employees who
9
submitted declarations in support of the Motion to Compel Arbitration;
10
WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding the arbitration related discovery and,
11
on April 1, 2013, filed a discovery dispute letter with the Court (Dkt. No. 36) (“Motion to Compel
12
Production”);
13
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2013, the parties attended a case management conference and the
14
Court ordered that the hearing on the Motion to Compel Arbitration be continued to June 28,
15
2013, with Plaintiff’s Opposition due on June 7, 2013 and Wells Fargo’s Reply due on June 14,
16
2013 (Dkt. No. 37);
17
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2013, the Court ordered Wells Fargo to respond to certain
18
arbitration-related discovery, directed the parties to meet and confer to determine a deadline for
19
Wells Fargo’s responses and dates for the depositions, and also provided that the parties could
20
submit, if necessary, a stipulation regarding a revised briefing schedule on the Motion to Compel
21
Arbitration (Dkt. No. 38) (“Order”);
22
WHEREAS, Wells Fargo has not yet provided responses to the arbitration-related
23
discovery, but has agreed to do so as soon as practicable and by no later than the dates set forth
24
below;
25
26
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2013, Wells Fargo represented that the earliest dates the Wells
Fargo declarants are available for their depositions are July 9, 2013 and July 11, 2013.
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff,
by their undersigned counsel, and Wells Fargo, by their undersigned counsel, that:
1079087.1
-1-
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI
1
(1)
2
Order by June 18;
3
(2)
4
(3)
(4)
The deadline for Wells Fargo to file a reply in support of its Motion to Compel
Arbitration is continued to July 31;
9
10
The deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to Wells Fargo’s Motion to Compel
Arbitration is continued to July 19.
7
8
Wells Fargo shall produce all information responsive to the ROGs as set forth in
the Order by June 28;
5
6
Wells Fargo shall produce all documents responsive to the RFPs as set forth in the
(5)
The hearing on Wells Fargo’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued to Friday
August 16 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court is available.
11
12
Dated: June 6, 2013
13
By:
Jonathan D. Selbin
Jonathan D. Selbin
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
Jonathan D. Selbin (State Bar No. 170222)
Email: jselbin@lchb.com
Douglas Cuthbertson
Email: dcuthbertson@lchb.com (admitted pro hac vice)
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Telephone: (212) 355-9500
Facsimile: (212) 355-9592
14
15
16
17
18
19
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458)
Email: dhutchinson@lchb.com
Nicole D. Reynolds (State Bar No. 246255)
Email: nreynolds@lchb.com
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
20
21
22
23
24
MEYER WILSON CO., LPA
Matthew R. Wilson (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: mwilson@meyerwilson.com
1320 Dublin Road, Ste. 100
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Telephone: (614) 224-6000
Facsimile: (614) 224-6066
25
26
27
28
1079087.1
-2-
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI
1
HYDE & SWIGART
Robert L. Hyde (State Bar No. 227183)
bob@westcostlitigation.com
Joshua Swigart (State Bar No. 225557)
josh@westcoastlitigation.com
411 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92108-3551
Telephone: (619) 233-7770
Facsimile: (619) 297-1022
2
3
4
5
6
11
KAZEROUNIAN LAW GROUP
Abbas Kazerounian (State Bar No. 249203)
ak@kazlg.com
S. Mohammad Kazerouni
mike@kazlg.com
Assal Assassi (State Bar No. 252835)
assal@kazlg.com
2700 North Main Street, Suite 1000
Santa Ana, CA 92866
Telephone: (800) 400-6806
Facsimile: (800) 520-5523
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin and the Proposed Class
7
8
9
10
13
Dated: June 6, 2013
By:
Kalama M. Lui-Kwan
Kalama M. Lui-Kwan
14
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
Mark D. Lonergan (State Bar No. 143622)
mdl@severson.com
Kalama M. Lui-Kwan (State Bar No. 242121)
kml@severson.com
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3344
Fasimile: (415) 956-0439
15
16
17
18
19
20
24
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
Eric J. Troutman (State Bar No. 229263)
ejt@severson.com
The Atrium
19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: (949) 442-7110
Facsimile: (949) 442-7118
25
Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank
21
22
23
26
27
28
1079087.1
-3-
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI
1
ATTESTATION
2
3
I, Jonathan D. Selbin, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Kalama M. Lui-Kwan has concurred in this filing.
4
Jonathan D. Selbin
Jonathan D. Selbin
5
6
7
8
ORDER
9
Pursuant to Stipulation, it is so ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: ____________, 2013
6/11
12
_____________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1079087.1
-4-
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?