Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 39 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Jonathan D. Selbin (State Bar No. 170222) jselbin@lchb.com Douglas Cuthbertson (admitted pro hac vice) dcuthbertson@lchb.com 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013 Telephone: (212) 355-9500 Facsimile: (212) 355-9592 MEYER WILSON CO., LPA Matthew R. Wilson (admitted pro hac vice) mwilson@meyerwilson.com LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & 1320 Dublin Road, Ste. 100 BERNSTEIN, LLP Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458) Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone: (614) 224-6000 dhutchinson@lchb.com Facsimile: (614) 224-6066 Nicole D. Reynolds (State Bar No. 246255) nreynolds@lchb.com KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor Abbas Kazerounian (State Bar No. 249203) San Francisco, California 94111-3339 ak@kazlg.com Telephone: (415) 956-1000 S. Mohammad Kazerouni (State Bar No. 252835) Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 mike@kazlg.com Assal Assassi (State Bar No. 274249) HYDE & SWIGART assal@kazlg.com Robert L. Hyde (State Bar No. 227183) 2700 North Main Street, Suite 1000 bob@westcostlitigation.com Santa Ana, CA 92866 Joshua Swigart (State Bar No. 225557) Telephone: (800) 400-6806 josh@westcoastlitigation.com Facsimile: (800) 520-5523 411 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 301 San Diego, CA 92108-3551 Telephone: (619) 233-7770 Facsimile: (619) 297-1022 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 22 23 MADELINE MARTIN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 26 Case No. 3:12-cv-06030-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendants. 27 28 1079087.1 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI 1 2 Plaintiff Madeline Martin (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, Wells Fargo filed a motion to stay and dismiss this action 4 and compel Plaintiff to arbitrate her claims as an individual (Dkt. No. 30) (“Motion to Compel 5 Arbitration”); 6 WHEREAS, on March 11, 2013, pursuant to Stipulation and Order (Dkt. No. 26), Plaintiff 7 served 13 arbitration-related requests for production of documents (“RFPs”) and seven 8 interrogatories (“ROGs”), and also proposed to depose the two Wells Fargo employees who 9 submitted declarations in support of the Motion to Compel Arbitration; 10 WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding the arbitration related discovery and, 11 on April 1, 2013, filed a discovery dispute letter with the Court (Dkt. No. 36) (“Motion to Compel 12 Production”); 13 WHEREAS, on April 2, 2013, the parties attended a case management conference and the 14 Court ordered that the hearing on the Motion to Compel Arbitration be continued to June 28, 15 2013, with Plaintiff’s Opposition due on June 7, 2013 and Wells Fargo’s Reply due on June 14, 16 2013 (Dkt. No. 37); 17 WHEREAS, on May 17, 2013, the Court ordered Wells Fargo to respond to certain 18 arbitration-related discovery, directed the parties to meet and confer to determine a deadline for 19 Wells Fargo’s responses and dates for the depositions, and also provided that the parties could 20 submit, if necessary, a stipulation regarding a revised briefing schedule on the Motion to Compel 21 Arbitration (Dkt. No. 38) (“Order”); 22 WHEREAS, Wells Fargo has not yet provided responses to the arbitration-related 23 discovery, but has agreed to do so as soon as practicable and by no later than the dates set forth 24 below; 25 26 WHEREAS, on June 3, 2013, Wells Fargo represented that the earliest dates the Wells Fargo declarants are available for their depositions are July 9, 2013 and July 11, 2013. 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff, by their undersigned counsel, and Wells Fargo, by their undersigned counsel, that: 1079087.1 -1- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI 1 (1) 2 Order by June 18; 3 (2) 4 (3) (4) The deadline for Wells Fargo to file a reply in support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued to July 31; 9 10 The deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to Wells Fargo’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued to July 19. 7 8 Wells Fargo shall produce all information responsive to the ROGs as set forth in the Order by June 28; 5 6 Wells Fargo shall produce all documents responsive to the RFPs as set forth in the (5) The hearing on Wells Fargo’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued to Friday August 16 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court is available. 11 12 Dated: June 6, 2013 13 By: Jonathan D. Selbin Jonathan D. Selbin LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Jonathan D. Selbin (State Bar No. 170222) Email: jselbin@lchb.com Douglas Cuthbertson Email: dcuthbertson@lchb.com (admitted pro hac vice) 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013 Telephone: (212) 355-9500 Facsimile: (212) 355-9592 14 15 16 17 18 19 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458) Email: dhutchinson@lchb.com Nicole D. Reynolds (State Bar No. 246255) Email: nreynolds@lchb.com 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 20 21 22 23 24 MEYER WILSON CO., LPA Matthew R. Wilson (admitted pro hac vice) Email: mwilson@meyerwilson.com 1320 Dublin Road, Ste. 100 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone: (614) 224-6000 Facsimile: (614) 224-6066 25 26 27 28 1079087.1 -2- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI 1 HYDE & SWIGART Robert L. Hyde (State Bar No. 227183) bob@westcostlitigation.com Joshua Swigart (State Bar No. 225557) josh@westcoastlitigation.com 411 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 301 San Diego, CA 92108-3551 Telephone: (619) 233-7770 Facsimile: (619) 297-1022 2 3 4 5 6 11 KAZEROUNIAN LAW GROUP Abbas Kazerounian (State Bar No. 249203) ak@kazlg.com S. Mohammad Kazerouni mike@kazlg.com Assal Assassi (State Bar No. 252835) assal@kazlg.com 2700 North Main Street, Suite 1000 Santa Ana, CA 92866 Telephone: (800) 400-6806 Facsimile: (800) 520-5523 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin and the Proposed Class 7 8 9 10 13 Dated: June 6, 2013 By: Kalama M. Lui-Kwan Kalama M. Lui-Kwan 14 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation Mark D. Lonergan (State Bar No. 143622) mdl@severson.com Kalama M. Lui-Kwan (State Bar No. 242121) kml@severson.com One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Fasimile: (415) 956-0439 15 16 17 18 19 20 24 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation Eric J. Troutman (State Bar No. 229263) ejt@severson.com The Atrium 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 442-7110 Facsimile: (949) 442-7118 25 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank 21 22 23 26 27 28 1079087.1 -3- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI 1 ATTESTATION 2 3 I, Jonathan D. Selbin, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Kalama M. Lui-Kwan has concurred in this filing. 4 Jonathan D. Selbin Jonathan D. Selbin 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 Pursuant to Stipulation, it is so ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: ____________, 2013 6/11 12 _____________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1079087.1 -4- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFT’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06030-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?