Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/2/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
[e-mail]
KALAMA M. LUI-KWAN (State Bar No. 242121)
[e-mail]
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9
10

ERIC J. TROUTMAN (State Bar No. 229263)
[e-mail]
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15 MADELINE MARTIN, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated
16
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
19
Defendant.
20

Case No.: 3:12-cv-06030-JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(L.R. 6-1(a))

21
22

WHEREAS, plaintiff Madeline Martin’s (“Plaintiff”) Proof of Service (Dkt. No. 5)

23

indicates that Plaintiff served the summons and complaint in this matter (“Complaint”) upon

24

defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) on December 4, 2012;

25
26
27
28

WHEREAS, Wells Fargo’s current deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint is December 26, 2012;
WHEREAS, Wells Fargo has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to an extension of Wells
Fargo’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until January 18, 2013; and
07685.1202/2507145.1

3:12-cv-06030-JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

1
2
3

WHEREAS, the proposed extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline
already fixed by Court order;
NOW THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their

4

respective counsel, that the time for Wells Fargo to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint

5

shall be extended until and including January 18, 2013.

6
7

DATED: December 21, 2012

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP

8
By:
9
10

/s/ Daniel M. Hutchinson
Daniel M. Hutchinson

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MADELINE MARTIN

11
12

DATED: December 21, 2012

SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation

13
By:
14
15

/s/ Kalama M. Lui-Kwan
Kalama M. Lui-Kwan

Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

16
17

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest

18

under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from

19

Daniel M. Hutchinson.

OO
IT IS S

NO

22

Judge Jo

RT

24

ER

A

H

25

pero

S
seph C.

LI

23

D

RDERE

R NIA

UNIT
ED

S

Dated: Jan. 2, 2013

RT
U
O

21

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

FO

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
07685.1202/2507145.1

3:12-cv-06030-JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

2