Jackson v. Pompan et al

Filing 22

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 18 19 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 10/21/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

PATRICK JACKSON,

9

Plaintiff,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. C 12-6049 SI (pr)
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

v.

11

DONALD POMPAN, Physician; et al.,

12

Defendants.
/

13
14

Defendant has filed a second ex parte request for an extension of time to file a dispositive

15

motion and/or answer to the complaint. Upon due consideration of the request and the

16

declaration of attorney Harry Gower, III, the court GRANTS the request. (Docket # 19.) The

17

court now sets the following new briefing schedule for dispositive motions: Defendant must file

18

and serve his dispositive motion and/or answer no later than December 6, 2013. Plaintiff must

19

file and serve on defense counsel his opposition to the dispositive motion no later than January

20

10, 2014. Defendant must file and serve his reply brief (if any) no later than January 24, 2014.

21

Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his opposition and/or for entry of default

22

is DENIED as moot. (Docket # 18.) This motion crossed in the mail with the court's first order

23

extending the deadlines for the dispositive motion and/or answer to the complaint.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2013

_______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge