Love v. Hill
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING 4 MOTION for Leave to File amended/supplemental pleading. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/7/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
Mark D. Greenberg
Attorney at Law
Cal. SBN 99726
484 Lake Park Ave., No. 429
Oakland, CA 94610
(510) 452-3126
5
6
7
8
Attorney for Terrell Love, P72631
Folsom State Prison
P.O. Box 715071
Represa, CA 95671
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
No. 12-06068 JSW
TERRELL LOVE,
Petitioner,
REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO
FILE SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING
(Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 15(d))
v.
RICK HILL, Warden,
AND ORDER THEREON
Respondent.
20
21
22
23
24
Petitioner in the above-titled action, through his counsel, and pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15(d), hereby requests permission to file a
supplemental pleading to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28
25
26
27
28
U.S.C. section 2254, on November 30, 2012.
Claim E in paragraph V of the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed on
November 30, 2012 was subject to a request for stay and abeyance, pending
29
30
31
1
1
2
disposition of that identical claim in a state habeas petition to be filed expeditiously. A
state petition raising the identical claim was filed in the California Suporeme Court as
3
4
case number S207493 on December 20, 2012. It was denied on February 13, 2013,
5
thereby rendering the request for stay and abeyance moot, and necessitating an
6
amendment to the original federal pleading filed in this case.
7
8
9
Dated: March 5, 2013
10
Respectfully submitted,
11
12
/s/ Mark D. Greenberg
Attorney for Petitioner
13
22
R NIA
hite
LI
ER
H
21
RT
20
W
ffrey S.
Judge Je
Dated: March 7, 2013
A
19
UNIT
ED
18
TED
GRAN
RT
U
O
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
NO
16
S
15
FO
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?