Love v. Hill

Filing 5

ORDER GRANTING 4 MOTION for Leave to File amended/supplemental pleading. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/7/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Mark D. Greenberg Attorney at Law Cal. SBN 99726 484 Lake Park Ave., No. 429 Oakland, CA 94610 (510) 452-3126 5 6 7 8 Attorney for Terrell Love, P72631 Folsom State Prison P.O. Box 715071 Represa, CA 95671 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 No. 12-06068 JSW TERRELL LOVE, Petitioner, REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING (Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 15(d)) v. RICK HILL, Warden, AND ORDER THEREON Respondent. 20 21 22 23 24 Petitioner in the above-titled action, through his counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15(d), hereby requests permission to file a supplemental pleading to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 25 26 27 28 U.S.C. section 2254, on November 30, 2012. Claim E in paragraph V of the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed on November 30, 2012 was subject to a request for stay and abeyance, pending 29 30 31 1 1 2 disposition of that identical claim in a state habeas petition to be filed expeditiously. A state petition raising the identical claim was filed in the California Suporeme Court as 3 4 case number S207493 on December 20, 2012. It was denied on February 13, 2013, 5 thereby rendering the request for stay and abeyance moot, and necessitating an 6 amendment to the original federal pleading filed in this case. 7 8 9 Dated: March 5, 2013 10 Respectfully submitted, 11 12 /s/ Mark D. Greenberg Attorney for Petitioner 13 22 R NIA hite LI ER H 21 RT 20 W ffrey S. Judge Je Dated: March 7, 2013 A 19 UNIT ED 18 TED GRAN RT U O 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA NO 16 S 15 FO 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?