Hamer v. City of Eureka et al
Filing
39
ORDER re 36 STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 05/17/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)
Case3:12-cv-06077-JSW Document36 Filed05/17/13 Page1 of 3
David P. Dibble, Esq. #73938
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID DIBBLE
123 F. St., Suite D
Eureka CA 95501
Telephone: (707) 444-9330
Facsimile: (866) 912-7460
diblawl@email.com
email:
Attorneys for Plaintiff Andrew Hamer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
l0
Fi ll
Plaintifi
F]
tr
te
lr(
e
e
)o
fr
0
a
12
vs.
l3
t4
r5
t6
frl
fE
CITY OF EUREKA; COUNTY OF
HUMBOLDT; CITY OF ARCATA; STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF THE
HIGHWAY PATROL; TERRY LILES,
MURL HARPHAM; BILL NOV& JOHN
DOE I,
t7
t8
U
lrl
fi
o
F
J
CaseNo. CV 12 -6077-JSW
ANDREW HAMER,
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT;
DECLARATION IN STJPPORT
THEREOF; ORDER
Defendants.
STIPULATION
r9
The parties to this action hereby stipulate that plaintiffbe granted leave to file the
!0
proposed Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
2t
DATED:
May 16,2013
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID DIBBLE
22
By:
23
24
25
/s/ David P. Dibhle
David P. Dibble, Esq.
Attomeys for PlaintiffAndrew Hamer
ilt
26
27
28
Stipuhtion for Leare to File Second Amended Gomplaint; Dec'laration in Support Thercot Oder - CV 126077-JSW
Case3:12-cv-06077-JSW Document36 Filed05/17/13 Page2 of 3
I
DATED:
May 16,2013
MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP
2
By:
3
Nancy K. Delaney, Esq.
Attorneys for defendants Clty of Eureka, City of
Arcata Terry Liles, Murl Harpham and Bill Nova
4
5
6
DATED:
ZWERDLING, BRAGG & MAINZER" LLP
May 16,2013
7
8
By:
9
V/illiam R. Bragg, Esq.
Attorneys for defendant County of Humboldt
l0
ll
DECLARATTON Otr'DAVID p. DIBBLE, ESQ.IN SUPPORT OF STTPULATION FOR
LEAVA TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
t2
I, DAVID P. DIBBLE, declare:
l3
That I am an attomey at law admitted to practice before this Court and all
t4
of the State of California and have my offrces in Eureka Humboldt County, California and
t5
one of the attorneys for the plaintiff in the within action. That I have personal knowledge
of
t6
following facts and if called upon to testiff could competently testiff thereto.
t7
Upon the filing of the Complaint in this action, plaintiff was unaware of
l8
identity of one of the law enforcernent personnel that assisted in the restraint and detention
t9
plaintiffon the morning of November 11,2011. In addition, plaintiffwas unaware of
2A
ernployer of that person. Accordingly, that person was named in the Complaint as John Doe
2r
and the agencies participating in this enforcement action were rulmed as his employer.
22
Since filing the complaint, defendant County
of Humboldt has identified
23
person as Humboldt County Sheriff Deputy SethN. Crosswhite. Accordingly, plaintiffdesires
24
file a Second Amended Complaint naming Deputy
25
defendant John Doe
26
l.
Seth
N. Crosswhite in place and in
stead
Plaintiff has also agreed to dismiss the City of Arcata upon i
representation that none of its personnel were involved in the restraint and detention of plaintiff
27
The proposed Second Amended Complaint incorporates these changes.
28
Stipulation for Leave to File
Sesnd Amended Complaint Declaration in Suppott Thereot Oder - CV 12€077-,SW
Case3:12-cv-06077-JSW Document36 Filed05/17/13 Page3 of 3
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is fue and corrcct.
Executed
this l6th day of May . 2013 at Nashville,
Tennessee.
ORDER
PURSUAI{T TO STIPULATION,IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 17, 2013
Hon. Jeftey S. White, Judge
Slipulation for
lsave to F[o Seco{rd Arncnded Cdnphht Dcdaration
in Suppod
Thcruot Oter - g1/ l2-SZ-rSVl,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?