Hamer v. City of Eureka et al

Filing 39

ORDER re 36 STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 05/17/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-06077-JSW Document36 Filed05/17/13 Page1 of 3 David P. Dibble, Esq. #73938 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID DIBBLE 123 F. St., Suite D Eureka CA 95501 Telephone: (707) 444-9330 Facsimile: (866) 912-7460 diblawl@email.com email: Attorneys for Plaintiff Andrew Hamer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 l0 Fi ll Plaintifi F] tr te lr( e e )o fr 0 a 12 vs. l3 t4 r5 t6 frl fE CITY OF EUREKA; COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT; CITY OF ARCATA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF THE HIGHWAY PATROL; TERRY LILES, MURL HARPHAM; BILL NOV& JOHN DOE I, t7 t8 U lrl fi o F J CaseNo. CV 12 -6077-JSW ANDREW HAMER, STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DECLARATION IN STJPPORT THEREOF; ORDER Defendants. STIPULATION r9 The parties to this action hereby stipulate that plaintiffbe granted leave to file the !0 proposed Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 2t DATED: May 16,2013 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID DIBBLE 22 By: 23 24 25 /s/ David P. Dibhle David P. Dibble, Esq. Attomeys for PlaintiffAndrew Hamer ilt 26 27 28 Stipuhtion for Leare to File Second Amended Gomplaint; Dec'laration in Support Thercot Oder - CV 126077-JSW Case3:12-cv-06077-JSW Document36 Filed05/17/13 Page2 of 3 I DATED: May 16,2013 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP 2 By: 3 Nancy K. Delaney, Esq. Attorneys for defendants Clty of Eureka, City of Arcata Terry Liles, Murl Harpham and Bill Nova 4 5 6 DATED: ZWERDLING, BRAGG & MAINZER" LLP May 16,2013 7 8 By: 9 V/illiam R. Bragg, Esq. Attorneys for defendant County of Humboldt l0 ll DECLARATTON Otr'DAVID p. DIBBLE, ESQ.IN SUPPORT OF STTPULATION FOR LEAVA TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT t2 I, DAVID P. DIBBLE, declare: l3 That I am an attomey at law admitted to practice before this Court and all t4 of the State of California and have my offrces in Eureka Humboldt County, California and t5 one of the attorneys for the plaintiff in the within action. That I have personal knowledge of t6 following facts and if called upon to testiff could competently testiff thereto. t7 Upon the filing of the Complaint in this action, plaintiff was unaware of l8 identity of one of the law enforcernent personnel that assisted in the restraint and detention t9 plaintiffon the morning of November 11,2011. In addition, plaintiffwas unaware of 2A ernployer of that person. Accordingly, that person was named in the Complaint as John Doe 2r and the agencies participating in this enforcement action were rulmed as his employer. 22 Since filing the complaint, defendant County of Humboldt has identified 23 person as Humboldt County Sheriff Deputy SethN. Crosswhite. Accordingly, plaintiffdesires 24 file a Second Amended Complaint naming Deputy 25 defendant John Doe 26 l. Seth N. Crosswhite in place and in stead Plaintiff has also agreed to dismiss the City of Arcata upon i representation that none of its personnel were involved in the restraint and detention of plaintiff 27 The proposed Second Amended Complaint incorporates these changes. 28 Stipulation for Leave to File Sesnd Amended Complaint Declaration in Suppott Thereot Oder - CV 12€077-,SW Case3:12-cv-06077-JSW Document36 Filed05/17/13 Page3 of 3 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is fue and corrcct. Executed this l6th day of May . 2013 at Nashville, Tennessee. ORDER PURSUAI{T TO STIPULATION,IT IS SO ORDERED. May 17, 2013 Hon. Jeftey S. White, Judge Slipulation for lsave to F[o Seco{rd Arncnded Cdnphht Dcdaration in Suppod Thcruot Oter - g1/ l2-SZ-rSVl,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?