Sanchez v. Viking Collection Service, Inc.

Filing 32

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL (Dkt. No. 30). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/17/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 ERICK SANCHEZ, 13 14 Plaintiff, Case No.: C-12-06096 TEH (JSC) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Dkt. No. 30) v. 15 16 17 18 VIKING COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1-10, Defendant. 19 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Written Discovery (Dkt. No. 30), 21 which has been referred to the undersigned (Dkt. No. 31). The Court hereby reschedules the hearing 22 on Plaintiff’s motion to August 22, 2013. The other briefing dates remain unchanged. In addition, 23 because it appears that the parties have not properly met and conferred regarding their discovery 24 dispute, the Court orders the parties to arrive at 9:00 a.m. on the date of the hearing, in Courtroom F, 25 15th Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California, prepared to meet 26 and confer in-person in the Court’s jury room. If any disputes remain following the meet-and-confer, 27 the Court will hear such disputes at 11:00 a.m. Alternatively, the parties may meet and confer in- 28 person in advance of the hearing date. The parties shall file a statement with the Court notifying it of 1 any in-person meet-and-confer at least two days prior to the hearing. Such statement shall also advise 2 the Court of what, if any, disputes remain following the in-person meet and confer. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: July 17, 2013 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?