Sanchez v. Viking Collection Service, Inc.
Filing
32
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL (Dkt. No. 30). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/17/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
ERICK SANCHEZ,
13
14
Plaintiff,
Case No.: C-12-06096 TEH (JSC)
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL (Dkt. No. 30)
v.
15
16
17
18
VIKING COLLECTION SERVICES,
INC., and DOES 1-10,
Defendant.
19
20
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Written Discovery (Dkt. No. 30),
21
which has been referred to the undersigned (Dkt. No. 31). The Court hereby reschedules the hearing
22
on Plaintiff’s motion to August 22, 2013. The other briefing dates remain unchanged. In addition,
23
because it appears that the parties have not properly met and conferred regarding their discovery
24
dispute, the Court orders the parties to arrive at 9:00 a.m. on the date of the hearing, in Courtroom F,
25
15th Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California, prepared to meet
26
and confer in-person in the Court’s jury room. If any disputes remain following the meet-and-confer,
27
the Court will hear such disputes at 11:00 a.m. Alternatively, the parties may meet and confer in-
28
person in advance of the hearing date. The parties shall file a statement with the Court notifying it of
1
any in-person meet-and-confer at least two days prior to the hearing. Such statement shall also advise
2
the Court of what, if any, disputes remain following the in-person meet and confer.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: July 17, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?