PeopleBrowsr, Inc. et al v. Twitter, Inc.

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REMAND filed by Twitter, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DURIE TANGRI LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913) mpage@durietangri.com JOSHUA H. LERNER (SBN 220755) jlerner@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT TWITTER, INC. CROWELL & MORING LLP MICHAEL KAHN (SBN 57432) mkahn@crowell.com GREGORY D. CALL (SBN 120483) gcall@crowell.com BEATRICE B. NGUYEN (SBN 172961) bbnguyen@crowell.com 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.986.2800 Facsimile: 415.986.2827 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS PEOPLEBROWSR PTY., LTD., PEOPLEBROWSR, INC. 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 PeopleBrowsr, Inc., and PeopleBrowsr Pty., Ltd., Case No. 3:12-cv-06120-EMC 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 v. Twitter, Inc., Defendant. [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REMAND ______________________________ Ctrm: 5 -17th Floor Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPL. AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOT. TO REMAND/ CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06120-EMC 1 Having considered the Join Stipulation Continuing Deadline to Respond to Complaint and Setting 2 Briefing Schedule for Motion to Remand, and having concluded that there is good cause to grant the 3 requested relief, the stipulation is hereby GRANTED. 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. Defendant shall have until December 27, 2012, to answer, move against, or otherwise 6 respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file any Motion to Remand by December 27, 7 2012. 8 9 2. Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand shall be filed by January 10, 2012. 2013 2013 10 3. Reply briefs shall be due by January 17, 2012. 11 4. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand will be 12 held on January 31, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. 2013 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 UNIT ED S 18 DATED: December _____, 2012 RT U O RT 20 dwa Judge E ER H 21 22 hen rd M. C NO 19 FO 18 R NIA D HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN RDERE UNITEDS SO O DISTRICT JUDGE I STATES FIED IT DI NORTHERN DISTRICT AS MO 17 LI 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPL. AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOT. TO REMAND/ CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06120-EMC 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that all counsel of record is being served on December 14, 2012 with a copy of this 3 document via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 4 5 /s/ Joshua H. Lerner JOSHUA H. LERNER 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPL. AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOT. TO REMAND/ CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06120-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?