Shankle v. TPG Capital, L.P.

Filing 14

ORDER granting 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Erica Shankle. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/5/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-06181-CRB Document13 Filed02/01/13 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 CATHERINE A. CONWAY, SBN 98366 cconway@gibsondunn.com JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285 jcripps@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Attorneys for Defendants TPG CAPITAL, L.P. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Joshua G. Konecky (SBN 182897) jkonecky@schneiderwallace.com SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.421.7100 Facsimile: 415.421.7105 15 Jeremy Pasternak (SBN 181618) jdp@pasternaklaw.com LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY PASTERNAK 445 Bush Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: 415.693.0300 Facsimile: 415.693.0393 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class 17 [Additional counsel appear on signature page] 13 14 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 ERICA SHANKLE on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 21 Plaintiffs, 22 v. CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 23 24 25 TPG CAPITAL, L.P., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT –CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB Case3:12-cv-06181-CRB Document13 Filed02/01/13 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES hereto through their respective counsel as follows: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), Plaintiff Erica Shankle (“ Plaintiff” ) 4 shall be permitted to file the First Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit A without the need 5 to file a formal motion. The First Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed as of today’ date, s 6 February 1, 2013, and Defendant does not object to the filing of the First Amended Complaint; 7 provided, however that Defendant shall not be required to file an Answer to the First Amended 8 Complaint, and all denials, responses and affirmative defenses contained in the Answer filed by the 9 Defendant to the original Complaint shall be deemed to apply to the First Amended Complaint. 10 2. The parties agree that Defendant, by filing this stipulation, does not agree that the 11 claims set forth in the First Amended Complaint are appropriate, and reserves all rights and defenses, 12 including, but not limited to, defenses based on statutes of limitation. 13 Dated: February 1, 2013 14 LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY PASTERNAK 15 16 /s/ 17 Jeremy Pasternak 18 Attorney for Plaintiff 19 20 21 Dated: February 1, 2013 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP 22 /s/ 23 Joshua Konecky 24 Attorney for Plaintiff 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT –CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB Case3:12-cv-06181-CRB Document13 Filed02/01/13 Page3 of 3 1 Dated: February 1, 2013 2 CATHERINE A. CONWAY RACHEL S. BRASS JESSE A. CRIPPS SARAH ZENEWICZ GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 3 4 5 6 /s/ Jesse A. Cripps 7 Attorneys for Defendants TPG CAPITAL, L.P. 8 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 February 5, 2013 Dated: ____________________ UNIT ED 13 14 O ORD IT IS S ERED . Breyer harles R NO 17 A H ER FO Judge C LI RT 16 R NIA The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 15 18 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 12 N F D IS T IC T O R C 101452747.2 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT –CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?