Shankle v. TPG Capital, L.P.
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Erica Shankle. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/5/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)
Case3:12-cv-06181-CRB Document13 Filed02/01/13 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
CATHERINE A. CONWAY, SBN 98366
cconway@gibsondunn.com
JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285
jcripps@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: 213.229.7000
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
Attorneys for Defendants
TPG CAPITAL, L.P.
7
8
9
10
11
12
Joshua G. Konecky (SBN 182897)
jkonecky@schneiderwallace.com
SCHNEIDER WALLACE
COTTRELL KONECKY LLP
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415.421.7100
Facsimile: 415.421.7105
15
Jeremy Pasternak (SBN 181618)
jdp@pasternaklaw.com
LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY PASTERNAK
445 Bush Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: 415.693.0300
Facsimile: 415.693.0393
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
17
[Additional counsel appear on signature page]
13
14
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
ERICA SHANKLE on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated,
21
Plaintiffs,
22
v.
CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA
SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
23
24
25
TPG CAPITAL, L.P., and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT –CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB
Case3:12-cv-06181-CRB Document13 Filed02/01/13 Page2 of 3
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES hereto through their
respective counsel as follows:
1.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), Plaintiff Erica Shankle (“
Plaintiff”
)
4
shall be permitted to file the First Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit A without the need
5
to file a formal motion. The First Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed as of today’ date,
s
6
February 1, 2013, and Defendant does not object to the filing of the First Amended Complaint;
7
provided, however that Defendant shall not be required to file an Answer to the First Amended
8
Complaint, and all denials, responses and affirmative defenses contained in the Answer filed by the
9
Defendant to the original Complaint shall be deemed to apply to the First Amended Complaint.
10
2.
The parties agree that Defendant, by filing this stipulation, does not agree that the
11
claims set forth in the First Amended Complaint are appropriate, and reserves all rights and defenses,
12
including, but not limited to, defenses based on statutes of limitation.
13
Dated: February 1, 2013
14
LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY PASTERNAK
15
16
/s/
17
Jeremy Pasternak
18
Attorney for Plaintiff
19
20
21
Dated: February 1, 2013
SCHNEIDER WALLACE
COTTRELL KONECKY LLP
22
/s/
23
Joshua Konecky
24
Attorney for Plaintiff
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
2
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT –CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB
Case3:12-cv-06181-CRB Document13 Filed02/01/13 Page3 of 3
1
Dated: February 1, 2013
2
CATHERINE A. CONWAY
RACHEL S. BRASS
JESSE A. CRIPPS
SARAH ZENEWICZ
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
3
4
5
6
/s/
Jesse A. Cripps
7
Attorneys for Defendants
TPG CAPITAL, L.P.
8
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
February 5, 2013
Dated: ____________________
UNIT
ED
13
14
O ORD
IT IS S
ERED
. Breyer
harles R
NO
17
A
H
ER
FO
Judge C
LI
RT
16
R NIA
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
15
18
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
12
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
101452747.2
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
3
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT OF ERICA SHANKLE AND TO FILE THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT –CASE NO. 12-C-06181 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?