Pragmatus Telecom, LLC v. Trend Micro Incorporated

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE UNTIL 4/26/13 re 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Trend Micro Incorporated, Pragmatus Telecom, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/25/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

ELIZABETH DAY (SBN 177125)
[e-mail]
IAN N. FEINBERG (SBN 88234
[e-mail]
DAVID ALBERTI (SBM 220625)
[e-mail]
SAL LIM (SBM 211836)
[e-mail]
YAKOV ZOLOTOREV (SBM 224260)
[e-mail]
MARC BELLOLI (SBN 244290)
[e-mail]
FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI &
THOMPSON LLP
1600 El Camino Real, Suite 280
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

15
16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Defendant
TREND MICRO INCORPORATED

Attorneys for Plaintiff
PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC

12

14

YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (SBN: 175421)
[e-mail]
D. STUART BARTOW (SBN: 233107)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650 815 7401

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC,
Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 12-06195 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION

v.
TREND MICRO INCORPORATED,
Defendant.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1FEIN BERG DAY
ALBERTI &
T H O M P S O N LLP

JOINT STIPULATION – CASE NO. 12-06195 EMC

1
2
3

Pragmatus Telecom, LLC (“Pragmatus”) and Trend Micro Incorporated (“Trend Micro”),
hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1.

Pragmatus has brought the above-captioned patent infringement action (the

4

“Action”) accusing Trend Micro of infringing three patents identified in the Complaint by

5

providing live chat services over the Internet (referred to herein as the “Live Chat Services”).

6

2.

Trend Micro represents that any Live Chat Services it has used in the United States

7

during the six years prior to the filing of the Complaint and subsequent to the filing of the

8

Complaint – have been provided by LogMeIn Inc. and LivePerson Inc.

9

3.

On November 21, 2012, LogMeIn filed a declaratory judgment action against

10

Pragmatus, captioned LogMeIn Inc. v. Pragmatus Telecom, LLC (No. 1:12-cv-01507-RGA) (the

11

“LogMeIn Declaratory Judgment Action”), which is currently pending before the District of

12

Delaware, and in which LogMeIn seeks judgments of (1) non-infringement of the patents-in-suit

13

by LogMeIn technology, and (2) invalidity of the patent-in-suit.

14

6.

Pragmatus represents that it anticipates resolution of the LogMeIn Declaratory

15

Judgment Action in the near future, and both Pragmatus and Trend Micro anticipate that the

16

resolution of the LogMeIn Declaratory Judgment Action will resolve this Action with respect to

17

Trend Micro’s use of LogMeIn technology.

18

7.

In light of the foregoing, Pragmatus and Trend Micro further stipulate and agree,

19

subject to the approval of the Court, that this Action shall be stayed until at least April 26, 2013 in

20

order to permit sufficient time for the LogMeIn Declaratory Judgment Action to resolve and for

21

the parties to resolve any other remaining issues.

22

8.

Pragmatus and Trend Micro will apprise the Court in advance of April 26, 2013 of

23

any future developments that would affect the agreed-upon stay and whether to continue the stay

24

beyond April 26, 2013.

25
26

9.

In light of the foregoing, Pragmatus and Trend Micro do not believe that ADR

needs to be selected at this time.

27
28
FEIN BERG DAY

-2JOINT STIPULATION – CASE NO. 12-06195 EMC

1
2

FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI & THOMPSON LLP
Dated: March 21, 2013

3

By /s/ Marc Belloli
Elizabeth Day
Ian Feinberg
David Alberti
Sal Lim
Yakov Zolotorev
Marc Belloli

4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff
PRAGMATUS TELECOM, LLC

8
9

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

10
11

By /s/ D. Stuart Bartow
Yar R. Chaikovsky
D. Stuart Bartow

12
13

Attorneys for Defendant
TREND MICRO INCORPORATED

14
15
16

SO ORDERED, this

17

S
20
21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA The Honorable Edward M. Chen

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

R NIA

UNIT
ED

19

March
day of_________, 2013.

RT
U
O

18

25th

25

Dated: March 21, 2013

FO

LI

H

26

RT

23

A

22

NO

24

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B),dIM. Chenattest that I have obtained the
hereby
dwar
Judge E
concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is
indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records
to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection
ER
C
upon request.
N
F

D IS T IC T O
R

By /s/ Marc Belloli
Marc Belloli

27
28
FEIN BERG DAY

-3JOINT STIPULATION – CASE NO. 12-06195 EMC