Laffen v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Plan Committee Investment Review Committee et al

Filing 49

ORDER granting 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Enlarging Time for Plaintiffs to File Amended Complaint filed by Mike Laffen. Amended Complaint due by 6/3/2013. Responsive pleadings 7/18/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/8/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JACOB H. ZAMANSKY (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
EDWARD H. GLENN JR. (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KEVIN D. GALBRAITH (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ZAMANSKY & ASSOCIATES LLC
50 Broadway, 32nd Floor
New York, NY 10004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212/545-1177

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
IN RE HP ERISA LITIGATION

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Master File No. C-12-06199 CRB
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CLASS ACTION
[Civil L.R. 6-2]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1
2
3
4

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND AMONG COUNSEL FOR
ALL PARTIES as follows:
WHEREAS, plaintiff has requested and defendants have consented to an enlargement of
time for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint in the above-captioned action;

5
6

WHEREAS, plaintiffs are currently due to file their amended complaint by May 20, 2013;

7

WHEREAS, defendants are currently due to file responsive pleadings by July 5, 2013;

8

WHEREAS, plaintiffs are currently due to file their opposition to defendants’ motions to

9
10

dismiss, assuming such motions are filed, by September 3, 2013;
WHEREAS, defendants are currently due to file their reply briefs in support of any

11
12
13
14
15
16

motions to dismiss by October 3, 2013
WHEREAS, the parties prefer to keep the briefing schedule roughly aligned with that of
the shareholder derivative action and putative securities class action before this Court; and
WHEREAS, there are no other pending dates set by the Court that would be affected by
entry of this Order.

17
18
19

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, and respectfully requested that the
Court order as follows:

20

1. Plaintiffs shall have until June 3, 2013 to file their amended complaint;

21

2. Defendants shall have until July 18, 2013 to file their responsive pleadings;

22
23
24
25
26

3. Plaintiffs shall have until September 3, 2013 to file their opposition to defendants’ motions
to dismiss, assuming such motions are filed; and
4. Defendants shall have until October 3, 2013 to file their reply briefs in support of any
motions to dismiss.

27
28

JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DATED:

May 2, 2013

ZAMANSKY & ASSOCIATES LLC
JACOB H. ZAMANSKY (admitted pro hac vice)
EDWARD H. GLENN, JR. (admitted pro hac vice)
KEVIN D. GALBRAITH (admitted pro hac vice)
/s/ Jacob H. Zamansky
JACOB H. ZAMANSKY
50 Broadway, 32nd Floor
New York, NY 10004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212/742-1177
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
and the Proposed Class
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
NICOLE A. DILLER
ROBERTA H. VESPREMI
SACHA M. STEENHOEK

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

/s/ Nicole A. Diller
NICOLE A. DILLER
One Market Street, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1
2
3
4
5
6

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
CHARLES C. JACKSON (admitted pro hac vice)
ANDREW SCROGGINS (admitted pro hac vice)
77 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5094
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Attorneys for Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company,
the Plan Committee, and the Investment Review
Committee

9

COOLEY LLP

7

10
11

16

/s/ John C. Dwyer
JOHN C. DWYER
STEPHEN C. NEAL
JEFFREY M. KABAN
JEFFREY M. WALKER
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
[phone]
[phone] (fax)

17

Attorneys for Defendant Margaret C. Whitman

12
13
14
15

18
19
20

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
ALLEN J. RUBY
TIMOTHY A. MILLER
RICHARD S. HORVATH, JR.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

/s/ Timothy A. Miller
TIMOTHY A. MILLER
525 University Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

28

JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM
LLP
ERIC S. WAXMAN
300 South Grand Ave., Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90071
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
[e-mail]

1
2
3
4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants Rajiv L. Gupta, Shumeet
Banerji, John H. Hammergren, Marc L. Andreessen,
Raymond J. Lane, Gary Reiner, G. Kennedy
Thompson, Patricia F. Russo, Ralph Whitworth, and
Ann M. Livermore

7
8
9
10

ORDER

11
12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

21

S

ER

R NIA
FO

J

H

20

RT

19

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

18

LI

17

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

A

16

S DISTRIC

E
TC
________________________________
AT
T
THE HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

RT
U
O

15

Dated May 8, 2013

UNIT
ED

14

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

C