Turner v. Tierney

Filing 89

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MOTION TO VACATE JANUARY 3, 2014 ORDER The motions are denied as untimely. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 17, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 STEPHEN B. TURNER, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 No. C 12-6231 MMC ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MOTION TO VACATE JANUARY 3, 2014 ORDER v. DUSTIN TIERNEY, Defendant. / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court are two motions, “Motion to Modify Settlement Agreement” and “Request to Vacate the January 3, 2014 Order of Dismissal as Settlement Has Not Executed,” both filed October 20, 2014, by plaintiff Stephen B. Turner. Defendant Dustin Tierney has filed opposition, to which plaintiff has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court finds the matters appropriate for decision on the parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for December 5, 2014, and rules as follows. By order filed January 3, 2014, in light of the parties’ having reached a settlement and having placed said settlement on the record, the Court dismissed plaintiff’s claims without prejudice and further provided therein that such dismissal would be vacated and the action restored to the calendar should any party, within 180 days, certify that the consideration for the settlement had not been delivered. The above-referenced motions 1 were filed more than nine months after the Court entered its order of dismissal. 2 Accordingly, the motions are hereby DENIED as untimely. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: November 17, 2014 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?