Mercado v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 21 Stipulation to file Amended Complaint. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

PAMELA E. COGAN (SBN 105089)
STACY M. TUCKER. (SBN 218942)
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
1001 Marshall Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063-2052
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-mail: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant,

LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
A Professional Corporation
Redwood City

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

8

11

FELI MERCADO,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE
COMPANY OF BOSTON,

15

CASE NO. C12-6262 MEJ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF BOSTON LEAVE TO SERVE AND
FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO
COMPLAINT

Defendant.

16
17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff FELI MERCADO and defendant

18
19

LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON (“LIBERTY LIFE”), by and through

20

its respective attorneys of record, that defendant shall be and hereby is permitted to serve and file

21

their Amended Answer to the Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and filed separately

22

herewith in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2).
All signatories to this document, and all parties on whose behalf it is submitted, have

23
24

\\\\

25
26
27
28
RC1/6944639.1/SMT

STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER
CASE NO. C12-6262 MEJ

1

authorized its filing, subject to Plaintiff’s right to file any motion to strike.

2

Dated: July 19, 2013

SPRINGER & ROBERTS LLP

3
4

By: /s/ Cassie Springer
CASSIE SPRINGER
Attorneys for Plaintiff, FELI MERCADO

5
6
7

Dated: July 19, 2013

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

9

By: /s/ Stacy M. Tucker
PAMELA E. COGAN
STACY M. TUCKER
Attorneys for Defendant, LIBERTY LIFE
ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON

10
A Professional Corporation
Redwood City

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

8

11
12

ORDER

13
14
15
16
17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, defendant is
granted leave to serve and file its Amended Answer to the Complaint in this action, attached as
Exhibit A to the stipulation, and defendant’s Amended Answer is hereby deemed served upon all
parties who have previously appeared in this action.

18
19

Dated: July __, 2013
23

20

By: _____________________________
Hon. Maria Elena James
United States Magistrate Court Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RC1/6944639.1/SMT

-2-

STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER
CASE NO. C12-6262 MEJ