Martin v. Cate et al

Filing 22

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL; ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/31/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2013)

1
2

*E-Filed 10/31/13*

3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

BRIAN DOUGLAS MARTIN,

11
12
13
14

No. C 12-6287 RS (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL;

v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

M. CATE, et al.,
Defendants.

15

/

16
17

The Court has directed defendants to file briefing regarding plaintiff’s motion

18

for reconsideration of the Court’s dismissal of certain claims from the first amended

19

complaint (Docket No. 14). Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket

20

No. 17), and his motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Docket No. 20), are

21

DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may renew such motions after defendants have filed

22

the above-mentioned briefing. Because his motion for leave has been denied, his second

23

amended complaint (Docket No. 21) is STRICKEN from the record, and shall constitute no

24

part of this action. The Clerk shall terminate Docket Nos. 14, 17, and 20.

25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 31, 2013
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

28
No. C 12-6287 RS (PR)
ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS