Aphena Pharma Solutions - Maryland LLC f/k/a Celeste Contract Packaging, LLC v. BioZone Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filing 74

STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process. Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 03/04/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ADRIENE PLESCIA LYNCH (State Bar No. 259100) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 333 South Hope Street Sixteenth Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 576-1000 Facsimile: (213) 576-1100 Email: adriene.lynch@alston.com ANDREW BENJAMIN KAY (DC Bar No. 463912) (admitted pro hac vice) KELLEY CONNOLLY BARNABY (DC Bar No. 998757) (admitted pro hac vice) ALSTON & BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 239-3300 Facsimile: (202) 239-3333 Email: andrew.kay@alston.com Email: kelley.barnaby@alston.com Attorneys for Plaintiff APHENA PHARMA SOLUTIONS – MARYLAND, LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 APHENA PHARMA SOLUTIONS MARYLAND, LLC, Honorable Samuel Conti Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 3:12-cv-06292 SC v. BIOZONE LABORATORIES, INC., et al., STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS LEGAL02/33960754v1 3:12-cv-06292 SC 1 2 3 4 TO THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI: Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 5 Court Processes: 6 ______ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 7 ______ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 8 ______ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 9 (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a 10 Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form 11 of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. 12 They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local 13 Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.) 14 Private Process: __X__ 15 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 16 The parties have agreed in principle to appear before a private mediator, but 17 have not yet agreed on a particular mediator. The parties are continuing to work 18 together to finalize their agreement and to identify a mediator with availability and the 19 requisite experience. 20 The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 21 ___X__ 22 23 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) _____ _ other requested deadline of __________, 2013. 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS LEGAL02/33960754v1 3:12-cv-06292 SC 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 DATED: March 1, 2013 4 5 ANDREW BENJAMIN KAY KELLEY CONNOLLY BARNABY ADRIENE PLESCIA LYNCH ALSTON & BIRD LLP 6 7 /s/ Adriene Plescia Lynch Adriene Plescia Lynch 8 Attorney for Plaintiff Aphena Pharma Solutions-Maryland, LLC 9 10 DATED: March 1, 2013 11 RICHARD WILLIAMS GRAY DUFFY, LLP 12 13 /s/ Richard Williams Richard Williams 14 Attorney for Defendant Daniel Fisher 15 16 DATED: March 1, 2013 17 ROBERT WALLACE WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 18 19 /s/ Robert Wallace Robert Wallace 20 Attorney for Defendants BioZone Laboratories, Inc. and BioZone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 21 [PROPOSED] ORDER 22 23 X _______ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 _______ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. RT Judge S 2 ER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS C N F D IS T IC T O R H LEGAL02/33960754v1 R NIA HONORABLEti SAMUEL CONTI on amuel C FO NO 28 LI 03/04/2013 DATED: _______ A 27 UNIT ED 26 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 25 3:12-cv-06292 SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?