Bascom Research, LLC v. Broadvision, Inc.

Filing 80

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/23/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

1 PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
[e-mail]
2 LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
[e-mail]
3
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
4 [e-mail]
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
5 990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
6 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
7
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC
9 Jon W. Gurka (State Bar No. 187964)
[e-mail]
10 Reza Mirzaie (State Bar No. 246953)
[e-mail]
11
Kendall M. Loebbaka (State Bar No. 285908)
12 [e-mail]
KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP
13 2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
14 Telephone: [phone]
15 Facsimile: [phone]
16 Attorneys for Defendant BROADVISION, INC.
17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20

BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC,

21
22

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No.: 12-cv-06297-SI
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

23 BROADVISION, INC.,
24

Defendant.

25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC (“Bascom”) and Defendant BroadVision, Inc.

2 (“BroadVision”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(a)(2) and (c), hereby stipulate for an order that:
3
1. Any and all claims of Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.
4
5

2. Defendant BroadVision, Inc.’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, and such

6

counterclaims may only be asserted in response to a complaint asserting infringement of

7

United States Patent Nos. 7,111,232, 7,139,974 and 7,158,971 (the “asserted patents”).

8

BroadVision shall not file any declaratory judgment action concerning the asserted patents

9
unless BroadVision is accused of infringing any of the asserted patents or threatened with a
10
11

lawsuit concerning any of the asserted patents.

12

3. The parties further stipulate that, pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the parties,

13

each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. The Clerk shall close

14

this file.

15
16

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17
18

DATED: April 22, 2013

19
20
21
22
23

By: /s/ Lisa Kobialka
Lisa Kobialka
Paul Andre
James Hannah
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff BASCOM RESEARCH, LLC

24
25
DATED: April 22, 2013
26
27

By: /s/ Jon W. Gurka
Jon W. Gurka
Reza Mirzaie

28 __________________________________________________________________________________
1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

Kendall M. Loebbaka
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant BROADVISION, INC.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 __________________________________________________________________________________
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ATTESTATION

1
2

I, Lisa Kobialka, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

3 Stipulation for Dismissal and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby
4 attest that the concurrence of the filing of this document has been obtained from Jon W. Gurka,
5

counsel for Defendant Broadvision, Inc.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 __________________________________________________________________________________
3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

In consideration of the Stipulated Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC

3 (“Bascom”) and Defendant BroadVision, Inc. (“BroadVision”), the Stipulated Dismissal is
4 GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that:
5
6
7

1. Any and all claims of Plaintiff Bascom Research, LLC are dismissed with prejudice.

8

2. Defendant BroadVision, Inc.’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, and such

9

counterclaims may only be asserted in response to a complaint asserting infringement of

10

United States Patent Nos. 7,111,232, 7,139,974 and 7,158,971 (the “asserted patents”).

11
12

BroadVision shall not file any declaratory judgment action concerning the asserted patents

13

unless BroadVision is accused of infringing any of the asserted patents or threatened with a

14

lawsuit concerning any of the asserted patents.

15
16

3. The parties further stipulate that, pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the parties,
each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees.

17
18

4. The Clerk shall close this file.

19
20
21
22

4/23/13
Dated: ____________________

_______________________________
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Court Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28 __________________________________________________________________________________
4
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO.C-12-06297-SI
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER