Veloz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company et al
Filing
165
SECOND NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 25, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 12-06309 WHA
RICHARD VELOZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
SECOND NOTICE RE
ORAL ARGUMENT
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY and
IBEW LOCAL 1245,
Defendant.
13
/
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Counsel should be prepared to address the following at the hearing on June 26:
1.
Where in the record is the direct proof that no appointment was scheduled for
plaintiff’s son to see Dr. Roge on February 26 or February 27, 2011? The fact that in July 2010,
Dr. Roge only expected to see the son a year later does not rule out the possibility that
something could have come up in the interim making an earlier appointment necessary.
2.
Paragraph 16 of the Declaration of Africa Davidson stated (Dkt. No. 139)
(emphasis added):
Concerned about the truthfulness of Plaintiff’s testimony about
the legitimacy of his absences and the dates of medical
appointments during the first session of his deposition, we
subpoenaed documents from his three health care providers and
noticed their depositions for February 26th and February 27th.
Their testimony demonstrated that Plaintiff had made material
misrepresentations, both to PG&E in 2011 and during the first
session of his deposition, regarding his activities in February
2011. They testified they had no appointments scheduled for his
son the weekend Plaintiff was supposed to report for storm
related, mandatory overtime assignment. They further testified
there was no need for such an appointment given that they were
not scheduled to see him for another 6 months.
1
Where is the testimony that no appointments were scheduled for Mr. Veloz’s son the weekend
2
he was supposed to report to the mandatory overtime assignment?
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 25, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?