James v. AT&T West Disability Benefits Program

Filing 18

ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/2/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 Northern District of California 9 San Francisco Division 10 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 13 14 DIANA JAMES, Plaintiff, No. C 12-6318 WHO v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT ENE Date: Evaluator: August 20, 2013 Bradford Huss 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request to excuse defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1's client representative, John D. Adkins, from appearing in person at the August 20, 2013, ENE before Bradford Huss is DENIED. The court finds that defendant has not adequately shown how requiring Mr. Adkins to attend the ENE in person would cause him ‘extraordinary or otherwise unjustifiable hardship’ as set for in ADR L.R. 5-10(d). Accordingly, the request is DENIED and Mr. Adkins shall attend the session in person. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 August 2, 2013 Dated By: Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?