Olsen v. The City of Oakland et al

Filing 90

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/5/2014)

1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5

SCOTT OLSEN,

6

No. C 12-6333 SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY

v.
7
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
8
Defendants.

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

/

On February 21, 2014, the parties submitted a joint statement regarding the status of various
discovery disputes. As to a number of outstanding issues (documents provided to the Frazier group, gaps
in radio communications recordings, electronic communications, IA files of Tango Team members, and

13
CPRB file), plaintiff requests the opportunity to file a motion to compel within 30 days if the parties are
14
unable to resolve these issues. The Court GRANTS this request.
15
With regard to the missing police surveillance videos, plaintiff requests the opportunity to raise
16
this issue again after Sergeant Rullamas’ deposition if plaintiff’s counsel remains dissatisfied with the
17
explanation for the discrepancy in the number of reported versus produced videos. The Court GRANTS
18
this request.
19
Finally, based upon the City’s representation that it has no SWAT training materials for the time
20
period requested by plaintiff other than those already produced, plaintiff seeks an order precluding the
21
City from offering at trial any unproduced SWAT training materials. The Court GRANTS this request
22
and so orders.
23
Accordingly, any motion to compel by plaintiff as to outstanding discovery matters must be filed
24
by March 21, 2014.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: March 5, 2014
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge