Orshansky v. L'oreal USA, Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDER granting 37 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Order Extending Time for Parties to File Opposition/Reply Briefs to Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending a Ruling By the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed by Maybelline, LLC, L'Oreal USA, Inc.. Reset Deadlines as to 34 MOTION to Stay. Responses due by 6/7/2013. Replies due by 6/14/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/5/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930)
[e-mail]
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Frederick B. Warder III (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP
1133 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Peter R. Afrasiabi (State Bar No. 193336)
[e-mail]
One LLP
4000 MacArthur blvd.
West Tower, Suite 1100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff

Jeremy Feigelson (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey S. Jacobson (Admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: [phone]

13
Attorneys for Defendants
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

LIAT ORSHANSKY, on behalf of herself
and others similarly situated,

19
Plaintiffs,
20
vs.
21
22
23
24

L’OREAL USA, INC. , a Delaware
corporation; MAYBELLINE, LLC, a New
York limited liability company dba
MAYBELLINE, NEW YORK,

Case No. 4:12-cv-06342-CRB
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR PARTIES TO
FILE OPPOSITION/REPLY BRIEFS TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS PENDING A RULING BY
THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Defendants.

25
26

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2(a), 7-7(d) and 7-12, the parties hereto, Plaintiff Liat

27

Orshansky, on the one hand, and Defendants L’Oreal USA, Inc. and Maybelline, LLC, a New

28

York limited liability company d/b/a Maybelline, New York (collectively “Defendants”), on the

Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
Case No. 4:12-cv-06342-CRB

28569\3617953.1

1
2

other hand, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.

On March 26, 2013 the Defendants filed their Notice of Motion and Motion to

3

Stay Proceedings Pending a Ruling by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Dkt. 34),

4

noticing the hearing for May 3, 2013. Opposition/reply briefs are currently due to be filed on

5

April 9 and April 16, 2013, respectively.

6

2.

On April 4, 2013, the Court advised counsel for Defendants that due to

7

sequestration the Court will be closed on May 3, 2013 and that Defendants should re-notice their

8

motion for an alternative date agreed to by the parties.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

3.

The parties have agreed to a new hearing date of June 28, 2013 and Defendants

have re-noticed their motion for hearing on that date.
4.

Local Rule 7-7(d) provides that a continuance of the hearing date does not in and

of itself change the briefing deadlines.
5.

The parties are agreeable, subject to Court approval, to continuing the briefing

deadlines in light of the over one month continuance of the hearing date.
6.

The parties agree that, subject to Court approval, the parties’ respective briefing

16

deadlines shall be extended so that Plaintiff shall file his opposition no later than June 7, 2013,

17

and Defendants shall file their reply no later than June 14, 2013.

18

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
Case No. 4:12-cv-06342 CRB

-2-

28569\3617953.1

1

DATED: April 4, 2013.

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

2
3

By:

/s/
C. Brandon Wisoff
Attorneys for Defendants

4
5
DATED: April 4, 2013.
6

ONE LLP

7
By:

/s/
Peter R. Afrasiabi
Attorney for Plaintiff

8
9
10
11
12
13

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1
I, Brandon Wisoff, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

14

Stipulation And Proposed Order. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1, I hereby attest that the

15

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I

16

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing

17

is true and correct.

18

Executed this 4th day of April 2013.

19
20

/s/
C. Brandon Wisoff

21
22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
S
UNIT
ED
NO

Hon. Charles R. Breyer
United States District JudgeR. Breyer
rles

27

RT

Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

ER

H

28

ha
Judge C

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
Case No. 4:12-cv-06342 CRB

-3-

FO

26

R NIA

D
RDERE
S SO O
________________________________
IT I

DATED: April 5, 2013

LI

25

RT
U
O

24

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

A

23

N

C
F
D IS T IC T O
R
28569\3617953.1