Murga et al v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
Filing
21
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/23/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)
Case3:12-cv-06350-CRB Document20 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
Michael Yesk (SB#130056)
Megan Dailey (SB#221574)
Yesk Law
70 Doray Drive, Suite 16
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
925-849-5525
yesklaw@gmail.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
OAKLAND DIVISION
8
9
17
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; BANK )
)
OF AMERICA, N.A.; AND MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, )
)
INC., DOES 1 – 100, INCLUSIVE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
18
WHEREAS the Parties have agreed that Defendant’s rescission of the Notice of Default against
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
19
RODOLFO MURGA AND VERONICA
HERNANDEZ ,
Case No.: C 12-06350 EDL
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
JUDGE: Honorable Charles R. Breyer
Plaintiff’s property has rendered the current lawsuit moot.
20
THEREFORE the Parties agree that the case shall be dismissed without prejudice, each side to
21
22
23
24
bear its own costs and fees.
Date: January 22, 2013
______/s/ Michael Yesk_______
Michael Yesk
Attorney for Plaintiffs
25
26
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE- 1
Case3:12-cv-06350-CRB Document20 Filed01/22/13 Page2 of 2
1
Date: January 22, 2013
2
______/s/ Brian S. Whittemore__
Brian S. Whittemore
Attorney for Defendants
3
4
BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
5
The Complaint is hereby Dismissed Without Prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and fees.
________________________________
United States District Judge
10
LI
ER
er
R. Brey
A
H
13
RT
12
NO
11
harles
Judge C
R NIA
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
FO
9
23
Date: January ___, 2013
UNIT
ED
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
7
S
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?