Lifescan, Inc. et al v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al

Filing 83

ORDER VACATING HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The hearing on motions 14 and 40 is vacated. Plaintiffs must respond to this order by 3/27/13. (jstlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LIFESCAN, INC., et al., Case No. 12-cv-06360-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 10 SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos.: 14, 40. Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 A hearing is scheduled for March 21, 2013, on Shasta and Conductive’s motion to dismiss, 13 14 Dkt. No 40, and Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 14. The hearing is 15 VACATED in light of Judge Davila’s order granting Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary 16 injunction in LifeScan v. Shasta, 5:11-CV-04494-EJD. See Dkt. No. 82, Plaintiffs’ Statement of 17 Recent Decision. By March 27, 2013, Plaintiffs shall show cause, in writing, why their claims should not be 18 19 dismissed for lack of standing in light of Judge Davila’s order, which appears to eliminate any 20 case or controversy between the parties. Plaintiffs must support their position with relevant 21 authority. The filing must contain a proposal as to what the Court should do with respect to the 22 pending motions and the case as a whole. Defendants may file a response by April 1, 2013. Alternatively, the parties may file a stipulation on or before March 25, 2013, that proposes 23 24 a course of action supported by authority with respect to the pending motions and Plaintiffs’ 25 claims. 26 // 27 28 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 20, 2013 ______________________________________ Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?