Lifescan, Inc. et al v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al

Filing 83

ORDER VACATING HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The hearing on motions 14 and 40 is vacated. Plaintiffs must respond to this order by 3/27/13. (jstlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

LIFESCAN, INC., et al.,

Case No. 12-cv-06360-JST

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9
10

SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos.: 14, 40.

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
A hearing is scheduled for March 21, 2013, on Shasta and Conductive’s motion to dismiss,

13
14

Dkt. No 40, and Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 14. The hearing is

15

VACATED in light of Judge Davila’s order granting Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary

16

injunction in LifeScan v. Shasta, 5:11-CV-04494-EJD. See Dkt. No. 82, Plaintiffs’ Statement of

17

Recent Decision.
By March 27, 2013, Plaintiffs shall show cause, in writing, why their claims should not be

18
19

dismissed for lack of standing in light of Judge Davila’s order, which appears to eliminate any

20

case or controversy between the parties. Plaintiffs must support their position with relevant

21

authority. The filing must contain a proposal as to what the Court should do with respect to the

22

pending motions and the case as a whole. Defendants may file a response by April 1, 2013.
Alternatively, the parties may file a stipulation on or before March 25, 2013, that proposes

23
24

a course of action supported by authority with respect to the pending motions and Plaintiffs’

25

claims.

26

//

27
28

1
2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 20, 2013
______________________________________
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2