Lifescan, Inc. et al v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al

Filing 86

ORDER STAYING ACTION re 83 Order to Show Cause, 84 Response to Order to Show Cause, 85 Response. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 8, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LIFESCAN, INC., et al., Case No. 12-cv-06360-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER STAYING ACTION 9 10 SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 83, 84, 85 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 A motion for a preliminary injunction is pending in this action for violations of the 14 Lanham Act. See Dkt. No. 14. On March 19, 2013, two days before the hearing on the pending 15 motion, District Judge Davila granted a motion for a preliminary injunction in LifeScan, Inc. et al. 16 v. Shasta Techs., LLC et al., Case No. 11-cv-4494 (EJD) (“the LifeScan patent case”), which 17 barred the production and sale of the product at issue in this action. The Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack 18 19 of a case or controversy and requiring each party to make a proposal as to how to address the 20 pending preliminary injunction motion and the case as a whole in light of the injunction issued in 21 the LifeScan patent case. Dkt. No. 83. In its response to that order, each party requests that the preliminary injunction motion and 22 23 all other proceedings in this case be stayed pending (1) the resolution of the motion to stay the 24 enforcement of the injunction in the LifeScan patent case, which currently is pending before Judge 25 Davila, and (2) the resolution of the motion to stay pending appeal that Defendants intend to file in 26 the Federal Circuit in the event that Judge Davila denies their motion to stay. See Dkt. No. 84 at 27 4; Dkt. No. 85 at 2. 28 // 1 Based on the parties’ submissions, this action is STAYED pending the final determination 2 of the enforcement of the injunction issued by Judge Davila. Within seven days of the date on 3 which the final determination is issued, the parties shall file a joint status report that explains the 4 impact of that determination on this action. 5 TERMINATED without prejudice, and all case deadlines are VACATED. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 8, 2013 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 10 11 United States District Court Northern District of California All pending motions in this action are 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?