Lifescan, Inc. et al v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al
Filing
86
ORDER STAYING ACTION re 83 Order to Show Cause, 84 Response to Order to Show Cause, 85 Response. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 8, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LIFESCAN, INC., et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-06360-JST
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER STAYING ACTION
9
10
SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 83, 84, 85
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
A motion for a preliminary injunction is pending in this action for violations of the
14
Lanham Act. See Dkt. No. 14. On March 19, 2013, two days before the hearing on the pending
15
motion, District Judge Davila granted a motion for a preliminary injunction in LifeScan, Inc. et al.
16
v. Shasta Techs., LLC et al., Case No. 11-cv-4494 (EJD) (“the LifeScan patent case”), which
17
barred the production and sale of the product at issue in this action.
The Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack
18
19
of a case or controversy and requiring each party to make a proposal as to how to address the
20
pending preliminary injunction motion and the case as a whole in light of the injunction issued in
21
the LifeScan patent case. Dkt. No. 83.
In its response to that order, each party requests that the preliminary injunction motion and
22
23
all other proceedings in this case be stayed pending (1) the resolution of the motion to stay the
24
enforcement of the injunction in the LifeScan patent case, which currently is pending before Judge
25
Davila, and (2) the resolution of the motion to stay pending appeal that Defendants intend to file in
26
the Federal Circuit in the event that Judge Davila denies their motion to stay. See Dkt. No. 84 at
27
4; Dkt. No. 85 at 2.
28
//
1
Based on the parties’ submissions, this action is STAYED pending the final determination
2
of the enforcement of the injunction issued by Judge Davila. Within seven days of the date on
3
which the final determination is issued, the parties shall file a joint status report that explains the
4
impact of that determination on this action.
5
TERMINATED without prejudice, and all case deadlines are VACATED.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2013
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
All pending motions in this action are
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?